"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Gandalf Grey wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Gandalf Grey wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Dwight Stewart wrote:

"-=jd=-" wrote:

Convincing anyone is none of my concern,
but I do reserve the right to wonder aloud
how a reasonable and prudent person
would ignore the mounting list of indicators
pointing to obvious forgeries. (snip)

Then I trust you won't mind if I reserve the right to wonder
aloud
why
you
are so determined to establish, and publically declare, these
documents
to
be forgeries.


Possibly because they are fake?

And possibly because your sound machine is a diversion from the real
issues
of this election.

The diversion was started by CBS when they aired the story.

Not at all. The FACTS about Bush's missing service time and his
dodging, IS
ALREADY KNOWN. The CBS report if anything was only more confirmation of
WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. Bush deserted his post and his daddy got him out
with
an honorable discharge.

Sorry, but I don't see how your response ties in with my last message.

Well, it's probably a little late in life for me to teach you how to think.


But if they are facts that are already known, how will forged documents
confirm them?

They don't need to be confirmed. The lapses are already there. The
testimomy of witinesses is already there. CBS wasn't really showing anyone
anything knew. Plus, Killian's secretary has come forward and testified
that the memos, fake or not, completely support how Killian felt about Bush.


As a reminder, you said:

And possibly because your sound machine is a diversion from the real
issues
of this election.

I pointed out this was started when CBS aired the story.

If they hadn't dug up 30+ year old allegations and used what appear to be
forged documents to create a story, we'd be discussing something else.

I doubt it.