Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475 dollars or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

dxAce

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often
had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475 dollars
or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

Simon M.

Simon Mason wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often
had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475 dollars
or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

That may be true, but not everyone can afford a Rolex, that's part of the
mystique, and the watch of spies.

dxAce

Simon Mason wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often
had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475 dollars
or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

Suddenly I got a picture in my head of some guy yelling at his old girlfriend as
she hops in the sportscar with the guy wearing the Rolex, " ...yeah, but my
Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex"... as she waves goodbye.

dxAce

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Simon Mason wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that
money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often
had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475
dollars
or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

Suddenly I got a picture in my head of some guy yelling at his old girlfriend
as
she hops in the sportscar with the guy wearing the Rolex, " ...yeah, but my
Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex"... as she waves goodbye.

Sounds like the guys timing was off.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

Suddenly I got a picture in my head of some guy yelling at his old
girlfriend as
she hops in the sportscar with the guy wearing the Rolex, " ...yeah, but
my
Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex"... as she waves goodbye.


Good riddance to the gold digger, I'd say -going off with another man 'cos
he's got a flash watch!

--

Simon M.

Simon Mason wrote:


Good riddance to the gold digger, I'd say -going off with another man 'cos
he's got a flash watch!

Say no more! The wench I had left me for a man who had *NO* watch!

Bahh! Personality, charm, manners and upbringing are **SO** overrated.





mike