Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Bryant wrote: From: m II Mike, out of curiosity, why are the frequencies in the order that would be seen going across the dial but the times are not following in the same sequential order? I'm going back and forth across bands. Sometimes starting at the top of a band and going down, others times working up a band. Sometimes, I'm just spot-checking parallel frequencies. I'm just randomly having fun and writing it down. Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Well, you've certainly made up a lot of stuff in the past, have you not? dxAce Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A, Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nospam" to reply) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Bryant wrote: From: m II Mike, out of curiosity, why are the frequencies in the order that would be seen going across the dial but the times are not following in the same sequential order? I'm going back and forth across bands. Sometimes starting at the top of a band and going down, others times working up a band. Sometimes, I'm just spot-checking parallel frequencies. I'm just randomly having fun and writing it down. Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. You're in no position to make demands, Fat Boy. dxAce |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
dxAce wrote: DesignGuy wrote: let the flame war begin Okay, I must have missed something here... posting logs to this newsgroup is a bad thing? I've seen others do the same thing, but no flamefest follows. It seems the OP is being singled out. Is it known for a *fact* that he is a phony/list logger/time traveler/radioless or merely speculation - or not even that? Well, the guy has lied about having a PhD, he's lied about getting fired from Louisville Technical Institute, he's lied about various aspects of his drug bust at Weber State University in Utah, etc., etc., etc. All proven facts. He's not very trustworthy. He claimed at one time to have a PhD, and after checking with various institutions it was determined that he never was granted a PhD. Records at Weber State University indicate he did not have a PhD while there, and there is no indication of him having one at Louisville Technical Institute where he is currently employed. He actually called me on the phone to tell me he'd been fired from Louisville Technical Institute, a fact that was readily checked by calling them on two occasions. He was not fired. Bryant made statements here several times about his glowing academic record, and even offered to send copies of his transcripts, which he never did, claiming he had not received them yet. That was some time back. Bryant also made statements to me on the telephone that he was not going to post to RRS ever again. As you can see, that is/was just another lie on his part. He just isn't a very believable individual. dxAce |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: DesignGuy wrote: let the flame war begin Okay, I must have missed something here... posting logs to this newsgroup is a bad thing? I've seen others do the same thing, but no flamefest follows. It seems the OP is being singled out. Is it known for a *fact* that he is a phony/list logger/time traveler/radioless or merely speculation - or not even that? Well, the guy has lied about having a PhD, he's lied about getting fired from Louisville Technical Institute, he's lied about various aspects of his drug bust at Weber State University in Utah, etc., etc., etc. All proven facts. He's not very trustworthy. He claimed at one time to have a PhD, and after checking with various institutions it was determined that he never was granted a PhD. Records at Weber State University indicate he did not have a PhD while there, and there is no indication of him having one at Louisville Technical Institute where he is currently employed. He actually called me on the phone to tell me he'd been fired from Louisville Technical Institute, a fact that was readily checked by calling them on two occasions. He was not fired. Bryant made statements here several times about his glowing academic record, and even offered to send copies of his transcripts, which he never did, claiming he had not received them yet. That was some time back. Bryant also made statements to me on the telephone that he was not going to post to RRS ever again. As you can see, that is/was just another lie on his part. Here is an email he sent me on June 5: Steve, You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers into this newsgroup ****. I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you another email. I need my job. Please. I don't have your savings. Please think of my family. Mike Bryant He just isn't a very believable individual. dxAce |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
DesignGuy wrote:
let the flame war begin Okay, I must have missed something here... posting logs to this newsgroup is a bad thing? I've seen others do the same thing, but no flamefest follows. It seems the OP is being singled out. Is it known for a *fact* that he is a phony/list logger/time traveler/radioless or merely speculation - or not even that? If you look at the logs Bryant posts you'll find he logs a station about every two minutes. When he tunes something in, if he doesn't recognize it right away, he looks it up on a schedule, finds the best fit, writes it down, and moves to the next one. Reminds me a bit of the cell phone ad "can you hear me now?" Purists feel you should wait until the station gives positive identification. He's bound to get some errors, so I'd be concerned if he was doing it for national security. But most of his logs probably are accurate. If you look in the archives, you'll find he's been a colorful character, and used to spend a lot of time in flame wars - calling just about anyone who disagreed with him a racist - even if race had nothing to do with the discussion. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. 30-1? And exactly what was -your- ratio before you "got religion"? Would you care to guess how many OT threads you started in, say, the last six months? And excuse me if hypocrisy is OT. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Mark S. Holden" If you look at the logs Bryant posts you'll find he logs a station about every two minutes. When he tunes something in, if he doesn't recognize it right away, he looks it up on a schedule, finds the best fit, writes it down, and moves to the next one. Yes, I do use ILG, HFCC, and EiBi databases to determine if the language being used matched up with known broadcasters, most of which have been broadcasting on the same freqs and times for years. I also look for IDs, you'll see many mentioned in the logs. Actually, when listening to news, two minutes is plenty of time to catch a correspondent ID. Reminds me a bit of the cell phone ad "can you hear me now?" Purists feel you should wait until the station gives positive identification. He's bound to get some errors, so I'd be concerned if he was doing it for national security. But most of his logs probably are accurate. If you look in the archives, you'll find he's been a colorful character, and used to spend a lot of time in flame wars - calling just about anyone who disagreed with him a racist - even if race had nothing to do with the discussion. He's bound to get some errors, so I'd be concerned if he was doing it for national security. But most of his logs probably are accurate. I challenge anyone to find one that's wrong. It's possible, but I think it will be difficult. These aren't low-powered Africans. My logs are mainly int'l broadcasters. My receiver, in recent logs, is a Degen 1103. And I'm not doing it for national security - I'm doing it for fun. If you look in the archives, you'll find he's been a colorful character, and used to spend a lot of time in flame wars - calling just about anyone who disagreed with him a racist - even if race had nothing to do with the discussion. Yes, this NG used to have a lot of racist posters. Any trip to the archives will make that readily apparent. At one time instead of an infestation of pro-Bush OT posts, we used to have a lot of people posting pro-racism posts. So much so, in fact, that some major racists like Kevin Strom of the National Alliance used to hang out in here. A lot of folks, ala Hal Turner, used to suggest that the racist posts were simply accurate. I'm not ashamed of helping to drive some of those folks out of this NG. But I'm trying my best to make some actual SW-related posts. Hopefully the passing of Nov. 2 will see people like Mark Holden return to shortwave. For others, like Telamon and DXAce, they'll be here, acting uncivilly and demeaning others, for trying to get this NG back to SW. I'm not against getting the newsgroup on to SW, but neither am I against pointing out your obvious and blatant lies. Some of them will go to great lengths to make up crap up and then repeat the lies 20 times a day. I for one have made nothing up. You, on the other hand certainly have. By the way, I just got off the phone with Louisville Technical Institute. That's 1-800-844-6528 by the way. dxAce |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
T. Early wrote:
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. I wasn't questioning credibility. I wanted to know why the frequencies were in order, but the reception times weren't. For a while, I thought it could have been the result of a spread sheet that was sorted on the 'frequency' column instead of the 'time'. Michael's response says otherwise.. mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RADIO TALKBACK Producers and Presenters | Broadcasting | |||
Sept 6 '04 Logs | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1399 Â June 4, 2004 | CB | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #643 | General | |||
Shortwave Radio Logs from Southern California-OC | Shortwave |