Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() From: m II Mike, out of curiosity, why are the frequencies in the order that would be seen going across the dial but the times are not following in the same sequential order? I'm going back and forth across bands. Sometimes starting at the top of a band and going down, others times working up a band. Sometimes, I'm just spot-checking parallel frequencies. I'm just randomly having fun and writing it down. Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A, Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nospam" to reply) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Bryant wrote: From: m II Mike, out of curiosity, why are the frequencies in the order that would be seen going across the dial but the times are not following in the same sequential order? I'm going back and forth across bands. Sometimes starting at the top of a band and going down, others times working up a band. Sometimes, I'm just spot-checking parallel frequencies. I'm just randomly having fun and writing it down. Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Well, you've certainly made up a lot of stuff in the past, have you not? dxAce Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A, Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nospam" to reply) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Bryant wrote: From: m II Mike, out of curiosity, why are the frequencies in the order that would be seen going across the dial but the times are not following in the same sequential order? I'm going back and forth across bands. Sometimes starting at the top of a band and going down, others times working up a band. Sometimes, I'm just spot-checking parallel frequencies. I'm just randomly having fun and writing it down. Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. You're in no position to make demands, Fat Boy. dxAce |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. 30-1? And exactly what was -your- ratio before you "got religion"? Would you care to guess how many OT threads you started in, say, the last six months? And excuse me if hypocrisy is OT. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T. Early wrote:
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. I wasn't questioning credibility. I wanted to know why the frequencies were in order, but the reception times weren't. For a while, I thought it could have been the result of a spread sheet that was sorted on the 'frequency' column instead of the 'time'. Michael's response says otherwise.. mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() m II wrote: T. Early wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. I wasn't questioning credibility. I wanted to know why the frequencies were in order, but the reception times weren't. For a while, I thought it could have been the result of a spread sheet that was sorted on the 'frequency' column instead of the 'time'. Michael's response says otherwise.. You will notice though that the first thing he jumped on was the possibility of you questioning his credibility... The boy has a lot of problems. dxAce |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article koD1d.8030$t61.1941@clgrps13,
m II wrote: T. Early wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: m II Do you think I'm making this stuff up? If so, please just go ahead and killfile me. To be honest, your off topic polittical posts seem to outnumber your SW posts by a margin of about 30 to 1. More SW, please, or I won't be seeing any of your posts. Of course that -would- be mike's "reward" for daring to question your credibility. SOP. I wasn't questioning credibility. I wanted to know why the frequencies were in order, but the reception times weren't. For a while, I thought it could have been the result of a spread sheet that was sorted on the 'frequency' column instead of the 'time'. Michael's response says otherwise.. Mikey is a good at lying. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RADIO TALKBACK Producers and Presenters | Broadcasting | |||
Sept 6 '04 Logs | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1399 Â June 4, 2004 | CB | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #643 | General | |||
Shortwave Radio Logs from Southern California-OC | Shortwave |