| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sanjaya" wrote in message ink.net... I've read and heard both sides of the argument about antenna tuners being great, or not helping at all and are a waste of money. IMHO..... for receive only I would not bother with one. If you want the maximum signal transfer then a tuner will make the receiver see the proper impedence... therefore more signal. Also more noise. Signal/noise ratio is what matters for a receiver. I very rarely run my receivers without the RF gain reduced 25-40% depending on noise. In the last ARRL 160 meter CW contest I operated in....2001... I did not have a beverage or any "special receive" antenna. Turns out a 5 element Force12 Yagi for the 10 meter band @ 50 feet was the best.....lowest signal/noise ratio....for most of the 1100 or so stations I worked. What was the impedence mismatch? Beats me.... but it worked . 73 es DX Ken KG4BIG |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| FS: Johnson Matchbox and TenTec Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Grounding an auto antenna tuner | Antenna | |||