IT Week
23 Sep 2004

There's been a lot of talk recently about a broadband access system called
Power Line Communications (PLC). Trials are being carried out on both sides
of the Atlantic, and the IEEE is working on standardising the technology.

With PLC, broadband data signals are injected into the local power
distribution network and are carried along the cables to all properties
connected to the same transformer. Anyone who wants the service just plugs a
unit into a convenient power socket and, bingo, there's the broadband
connection.

This all sounds like good news but let's take a closer look at the way it
works. It's pretty difficult to transmit high-speed data signals over power
cables because of the high levels of interference present, so engineers have
had to work hard to devise systems that can run at broadband rates.
Acceptable performance has been achieved by transmitting at high power
levels and by using large bandwidth with frequencies up to about 30MHz to
carry the signals. Unfortunately power cables were not designed to carry
frequencies much above 50Hz and they are not well balanced at high
frequencies, which means that the signal leaks out of the cable as a radio
transmission.

Tests have shown that these emissions can be quite intense and can cause
serious problems for licensed users of the radio spectrum such as short wave
broadcasters, aviation transmitters and radio amateurs. In fact a technical
argument has been running for several years between the radio users and the
proponents of PLC. In the latter camp is the European Commission, which
thinks that PLC should be deployed quickly because it is another competitor
to ADSL and that means better deals for broadband users.

The EC now seems fed up with the arguments and recently issued a
recommendation to encourage trials to go ahead but with no control on the
levels of interference. This decision has enraged the radio people.

The government seems to be backing PLC. One might expect the MoD or the
Civil Aviation Authority, as heavy users of radio communications, to be
against PLC but they have been strangely silent.

I think that the radio people have a point. It is a bad idea to wreck the
performance of radio systems so that we can have yet another broadband
system to compete with ADSL and wireless.

Users will soon want speeds higher than can be provided by PLC and I doubt
that it makes economic sense to invest in a technology that can only have a
few years of life. Nevertheless, the power people will roll out their
systems and the radio people will continue to fight. Time, politics and the
market will decide the result.

http://www.vnunet.com/comment/1158314

Mike Terry wrote:

IT Week
23 Sep 2004

There's been a lot of talk recently about a broadband access system called
Power Line Communications (PLC).

The correct terminology is 'Broadband Power Line' or BPL.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"starman" wrote in message
...
Mike Terry wrote:

IT Week
23 Sep 2004

There's been a lot of talk recently about a broadband access system
called
Power Line Communications (PLC).

The correct terminology is 'Broadband Power Line' or BPL.



They mean the same thing. The ARRL uses both terms in some of it's
literature.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/04/30/2/more.html

For whatever reason, BPL is used mostly in the US, and PLC is more common
abroad. There's a comedic theory which states that hard consonants are
funnier than soft consonants. Based on that theory, the term BPL could be
as much as 100% funnier than PLC

Frank Dresser.

Frank Dresser wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...
Mike Terry wrote:

IT Week
23 Sep 2004

There's been a lot of talk recently about a broadband access system
called
Power Line Communications (PLC).

The correct terminology is 'Broadband Power Line' or BPL.



They mean the same thing. The ARRL uses both terms in some of it's
literature.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/04/30/2/more.html

For whatever reason, BPL is used mostly in the US, and PLC is more common
abroad. There's a comedic theory which states that hard consonants are
funnier than soft consonants. Based on that theory, the term BPL could be
as much as 100% funnier than PLC

Frank Dresser.

I've found that using the term 'BPL' in a web search will produce more
results than 'PLC'.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"starman" wrote in message
...

Frank Dresser wrote:

[snip]

There's a comedic theory which states that hard consonants are
funnier than soft consonants. Based on that theory, the term BPL could
be
as much as 100% funnier than PLC


I've found that using the term 'BPL' in a web search will produce more
results than 'PLC'.



Theory confirmed. BPL gets more hits than PLC on Giggle.com.

Frank Dresser

"Frank Dresser" wrote in message
...

"starman" wrote in message
...

Frank Dresser wrote:

[snip]

There's a comedic theory which states that hard consonants are
funnier than soft consonants. Based on that theory, the term BPL could
be
as much as 100% funnier than PLC


I've found that using the term 'BPL' in a web search will produce more
results than 'PLC'.



Theory confirmed. BPL gets more hits than PLC on Giggle.com.

Frank Dresser

But if you really want to be pedantic, the correct term is actually BPLC -
Broadband Power Line Communications, according to the Australian
Communications Authority that is...