m II wrote:

Brian Running wrote:
Brian, Just vote "Right" vote "Republican" and live happy ever after!!!

We'll put a new radio on you desk, a cold drink in your hand and music
to your ears!!!

Trust Us!!!!


Well, okay.

No, NO! The (fill in name of OTHER party) will *empty* your glass of
that hard earned refreshment! The treasury MUST be refilled by the work
of the next four generations..sacrifices WILL be made!

They will FORCE you to listen to whatever music/talk show makes THEM
the most money! All that on an IMPORTED communist Chinese radio that put
ANOTHER twenty thousand of your fellow countrymen out of work!

LMAO at the 'tard whose country imported leaking, rusting submarines.

Instead of the Captain shouting out "dive, dive, dive" he shouts out "sink,
sink, sink".

LMAO at the stupid Canadian 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"m II" wrote in message
news:Rf4ad.4437$qU.1469@clgrps13...
Brian Hill wrote:

Gee Mike can't I keep my guns too. They really go good with freedom of
speech. Or am I reading you wrong?


Sure, no problem. You've never struck me as being as unbalanced as the
'Ace is. It's not the weaponry that bothers me. It's mental cases who
buy ammo in thousand round lots because of irregular voter registrations
in Ohio. At seventy five bucks per thousand, he's most likely supporting
the Chinese arms industry. Not exactly a patriotic move I'd say.

It's time to throw the manipulative *******s OUT of power, not shoot
voters.



mike

I feel better now.

B.H.

m II wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

Gee Mike can't I keep my guns too. They really go good with freedom of
speech. Or am I reading you wrong?

Sure, no problem. You've never struck me as being as unbalanced as the
'Ace is. It's not the weaponry that bothers me. It's mental cases who
buy ammo in thousand round lots because of irregular voter registrations
in Ohio. At seventy five bucks per thousand, he's most likely supporting
the Chinese arms industry. Not exactly a patriotic move I'd say.

A truly patriotic move would be to throw off the yoke of your colonial masters
and become a truly independent country.

I mean, those dang rusty, leaky subs were carrying the name HMCS...

You know what 'HMCS' stands for, 'tard boy? It stands for 'Her Majesty's
Canadian Ship'.

You folks got a Queen there. or are you a sovereign nation?

Can't muster up the courage, can you?

LMAO at the Canadian 'tard boy who hasn't a damn clue.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote
| You know what 'HMCS' stands for, 'tard boy? It stands for 'Her Majesty's
| Canadian Ship'.

I thought it was "Help, My Canoe's Sinking!"

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
link.net...

"dxAce" wrote
| You know what 'HMCS' stands for, 'tard boy? It stands for 'Her Majesty's
| Canadian Ship'.

I thought it was "Help, My Canoe's Sinking!"

That's a good one. It's true, the Canadian military does come in for it's
fair share of mockery, and for good reason.

Having said that, when a serviceman dies, the Canadian government doesn't
pretend the death never happened. The Prime Minister actually attends and
pays his respects when the recovered body is returned home, and television
cameras are allowed to cover the dignified ceremony.

Contrast that to the American President, who sweeps the sacrifices of young
men under the rug, hides it from public view, makes no mention of the
sacrifice, instead using Orwellian rationale to "protect the family's
privacy," all the better to hide the truth and make fun of real Vets by
distributing purple bandaids.

"Dan" wrote in message
...

OTOH, the US is in a war.

Oh, don't be mistaken, Canada is at war, but they're still trying to mop up
the War on Poverty. I think Clinton started that one. When they succeed
there, then maybe they'll get back to the business of tackling the War on
Drugs. (Not sure if that one was Reagan's or Bush Sr.'s.) Priorities,
y'know? Curious how the United States adapted the "enemy of my enemy is my
friend" switheroo (a Flip-Flop? God forbid!!!) on that one, handing the job
of hunting down Osama to Afghan opium druglords who killed good young men
like Pat Tillman. It's hard to say when that war will conclude, as we've
since heard that America's champion allies are having their best bumper
opium harvest in decades. I guess that's what George W. Bush means by
"smoking 'em out" ... hitting the opium bong.

A war which the US did not start, but
will, in all likelyhood, finish.

Big laughs that. I know, I know, balsa-wood surveillance drones held
together with bungey-cords with a flight maxiimum of 150 kms are "the most
lethal weapons ever devised by mankind," and yes, those really were mushroom
clouds.

News flash - servicemen die in war.

1062 and counting, I believe, at least 900 post-"Mission Accomplished -- We
Have Prevailed!!" Huzzah!!



Dan

"Dan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:30:45 -0400, "zerbo" wrote:

Having said that, when a serviceman dies, the Canadian government doesn't
pretend the death never happened. The Prime Minister actually attends and
pays his respects when the recovered body is returned home, and television
cameras are allowed to cover the dignified ceremony.

How many servicemen does Canada lose? 10 per century?

OTOH, the US is in a war. A war which the US did not start, but
will, in all likelyhood, finish. News flash - servicemen die in war.

Dan


The US is *ALWAYS* in a war...

Watch out Canada - they have their sights set on you too!!

"Dan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:30:45 -0400, "zerbo" wrote:

Having said that, when a serviceman dies, the Canadian government doesn't
pretend the death never happened. The Prime Minister actually attends and
pays his respects when the recovered body is returned home, and television
cameras are allowed to cover the dignified ceremony.

How many servicemen does Canada lose? 10 per century?

OTOH, the US is in a war. A war which the US did not start, but
will, in all likelyhood, finish. News flash - servicemen die in war.

Dan


BTW - the last time I saw your good old US Navy fighter jets over here in
Australia, they couldn't land on the runway of our air force base because it
didn't have any cables across it and it was too short for them to land an
F14 (or whatever)!!!

Mind you, they use that base to land 747's and your Galaxy's without probs -
just your retarded fighter pilots that can't land a plane without a cable to
stop them!! BWAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!

Has the US Air Force/Navy stopped bombing their own allies yet??? No wonder
countries are hesitant to rally alongside the US - how many british forces
were lost due to 'friendly fire' from US planes?????

And you wanna pick on Canada?? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Dan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:05:43 -0400, "zerbo" wrote:

News flash - servicemen die in war.

1062 and counting, I believe, at least 900 post-"Mission Accomplished --
We
Have Prevailed!!" Huzzah!!

An extremely small number, by any measure. Hell, there were 42,643
people killed in traffic accidents alone in the US in 2003.

I like that!! A new War On Traffic Accidents.

That
means that EVERY YEAR, we lose nearly the same amount as we lost in
the entire Vietnam war. 1062 lives lost in a war for our very
survival is a trivial number.

Is 3000 people killed in the WTC a "trivial number"? I certainly hope not.
Or why else would you be paying down a couple cool trillion dollars on them?



Kinda puts it in perspective, doesn't it?

Dan

"Dan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:35:05 -0400, "zerbo" wrote:


Is 3000 people killed in the WTC a "trivial number"? I certainly hope
not.

Of course not. That's what started the current war.

The president and vice-president now isist that Saddam had no connection to
9/11. They blame Osama for that. (Osama is the guy that Bush outsourced the
hunt to opium warlords instead of U.S. special forces.)

3000 innocent
civilians, BTW.

Those traffic fatalities were innocent too. By your own count, not mine,
these are trivial.



Dan