| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with you that Sanyo A/V equipment is junk. However, their
cell phones are uncharacteristically excellent. Absolutely! Conversely, I have a Samsung refrigerator in my kitchen and a Samsung 19 inch LCD display on my computer, and they are excellent products that I have highly praised and recommended to other people. However Samsung's cell phones, for lack of a better term, are total ****. Every Samsung cell phone I've tried from 1999 all the way to the present are cheaply constructed, have horrible audio quality, and couldn't hold calls even when I was outside and in plain view of a Sprint cell tower. I bought a Sanyo 5300 before coming to college just so that I wouldn't have to fight with the Samsung I had before that, since it would be my only phone. I activated it and have had only a few rare problems with it. A year after I got my 5300, my sister started to whine DAILY to me that "Sprint sucks so bad, I get cut off a minute into each and every call." She really wasn't lying. This was during the last 3 months or our 2-year contract, and both my parents' and sister's Samsungs were deteriorating fast, even after PRL/firmware updates. I was constantly telling her that it was the phone, not the service, but she wanted to switch to Verizon badly. I told her to give Sprint a chance, specifically with Sanyo 4920s. She hasn't mentioned one dropped call since. Talk about a total 180, huh? The retention deal wasn't too bad, either. Why would Sprint represent their service so poorly with Samsung phones instead of pushing Sanyo? In retail, repeat sales always takes precedence over a higher phone-profit-margin. It seems like a no-brainer. Oh, and the Samsungs were all A400s. -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phil, Squid-in-Training wrote:
Why would Sprint represent their service so poorly with Samsung phones instead of pushing Sanyo? In retail, repeat sales always takes precedence over a higher phone-profit-margin. It seems like a no-brainer. Samsungs are OK. I like my A660. However, they could be better at holding signals - my wife's (discontinued) Hitachi P300 seems to generally be better than mine is. For RF, it probably doesn't come close to the Sanyo phones. -- JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED) Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil, Squid-in-Training" wrote in message
... Why would Sprint represent their service so poorly with Samsung phones instead of pushing Sanyo? In retail, repeat sales always takes precedence over a higher phone-profit-margin. It seems like a no-brainer. Oh, and the Samsungs were all A400s. I'm not familiar with the Samsung A400, but our family has used Samsung A620 (VGA1000) phones for the past year, and we like them quite well. Before that we used the Samsung 8500, also a nice phone. -- John Richards |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
| Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
| very irronic: cell phone eavesdropping & old tv sets | Scanner | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||