Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 03:55 AM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Conan Ford wrote:

I see that the FCC has approved modified part 15 rules to allow BPL
deployment. If I understand correctly, without the modified rules the BPL
providers are emitting more interference than permitted. I see no
dissenting opinion from anyone in the FCC board, and only a cursory mention
to "licensed radio services" and "amateur radio." The only protection
action to be taken is notching in case of complaints from users of amateur
radio and "licensed radio." Aeronautical communications are mentioned as
needing protection (no BPL on those frequencies entirely). If BPL is so
interference-free as the proponents would lead people to believe, why the
need to notch the aeronautical bands? Obviously interference will be both
very high and long distance. Is this the end of shortwave around the
world? I have no doubt that being in southern Canada, this will make
hearing shortwave broadcasts more difficult. In BPL deployed areas in the
USA, I wouldn't be surprised if it is impossible.


The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider,
siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's
hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry
will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 05:21 AM
Buzzygirl
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"starman" wrote in message
...

The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider,
siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's
hard to say what the future of BPL will be.


I see at least *some* hope where this is concerned. At least a couple of
power companies shut down their BPL field trials before their scheduled
end-dates. Check out these articles:

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/08/06/2/?nc=1

http://www2.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/

I only hope that most power companies considering implementing this
technology will come to see the BPL profit to loss ratios as being far
skewed towards the latter rather than the former.

Jackie


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 02:34 PM
Stephen M.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Buzzygirl" wrote in message
news:3fIbd.250180$D%.124364@attbi_s51...
|
| "starman" wrote in message
| ...
|
| The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider,
| siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's
| hard to say what the future of BPL will be.
|
| I see at least *some* hope where this is concerned. At least a couple of
| power companies shut down their BPL field trials before their scheduled
| end-dates. Check out these articles:
|
| http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/08/06/2/?nc=1
|
| http://www2.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/
|
| I only hope that most power companies considering implementing this
| technology will come to see the BPL profit to loss ratios as being far
| skewed towards the latter rather than the former.
|
| Jackie

Regarding amateur radio operators of General Class up through Extra:
The FCC states that hams are required to use the minimum power
necessary to establish and maintain HF communications. It is my belief
that, in areas where BPL is used, we will need to use the maximum of
1,500 watts. BPL causes interference - this we already know - but BPL
can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use
a higher power. (insert evil grin here)

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04


  #4   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 07:47 AM
Mark Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message but BPL
can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use
a higher power. (insert evil grin here)


Lets all become obsolete old farts and run long winded, high power,
weiner roasting, AM!!! Let the Calling All Powerlines "CAP" contests
begin! My henry console is jumping around squeaking and beeping like
R2D2 just itching to join the fight against the dark side. MK
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 04:50 PM
Stephen M.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark Keith" wrote in message
...
| "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message but BPL
| can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use
| a higher power. (insert evil grin here)
|
| Lets all become obsolete old farts and run long winded, high power,
| weiner roasting, AM!!! Let the Calling All Powerlines "CAP" contests
| begin! My henry console is jumping around squeaking and beeping like
| R2D2 just itching to join the fight against the dark side. MK

Perfect! Wiiiiideband AM, maybe 10 KHz wide, for that sweet,
high - fidelity sound.

Of course, we should all get one transmitter for every band...

This idea makes the upcoming Hamfest Minnesota seem even
more promising!

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 08:57 PM
Jim Haynes
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , starman wrote:

The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider,
siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's
hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry
will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation.

Or, it may be necessary to sue FCC to enforce its own regulations.

--

jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

  #7   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 09:31 AM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Haynes wrote:

In article , starman wrote:

The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider,
siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's
hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry
will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation.

Or, it may be necessary to sue FCC to enforce its own regulations.


That would be a class action suit I would support.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017