Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Conan Ford wrote:
I see that the FCC has approved modified part 15 rules to allow BPL deployment. If I understand correctly, without the modified rules the BPL providers are emitting more interference than permitted. I see no dissenting opinion from anyone in the FCC board, and only a cursory mention to "licensed radio services" and "amateur radio." The only protection action to be taken is notching in case of complaints from users of amateur radio and "licensed radio." Aeronautical communications are mentioned as needing protection (no BPL on those frequencies entirely). If BPL is so interference-free as the proponents would lead people to believe, why the need to notch the aeronautical bands? Obviously interference will be both very high and long distance. Is this the end of shortwave around the world? I have no doubt that being in southern Canada, this will make hearing shortwave broadcasts more difficult. In BPL deployed areas in the USA, I wouldn't be surprised if it is impossible. The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider, siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "starman" wrote in message ... The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider, siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's hard to say what the future of BPL will be. I see at least *some* hope where this is concerned. At least a couple of power companies shut down their BPL field trials before their scheduled end-dates. Check out these articles: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/08/06/2/?nc=1 http://www2.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/ I only hope that most power companies considering implementing this technology will come to see the BPL profit to loss ratios as being far skewed towards the latter rather than the former. Jackie |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Buzzygirl" wrote in message news:3fIbd.250180$D%.124364@attbi_s51... | | "starman" wrote in message | ... | | The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider, | siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's | hard to say what the future of BPL will be. | | I see at least *some* hope where this is concerned. At least a couple of | power companies shut down their BPL field trials before their scheduled | end-dates. Check out these articles: | | http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/08/06/2/?nc=1 | | http://www2.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/06/28/2/ | | I only hope that most power companies considering implementing this | technology will come to see the BPL profit to loss ratios as being far | skewed towards the latter rather than the former. | | Jackie Regarding amateur radio operators of General Class up through Extra: The FCC states that hams are required to use the minimum power necessary to establish and maintain HF communications. It is my belief that, in areas where BPL is used, we will need to use the maximum of 1,500 watts. BPL causes interference - this we already know - but BPL can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use a higher power. (insert evil grin here) 73, -- Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota "If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up." - Anonymous --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message but BPL
can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use a higher power. (insert evil grin here) Lets all become obsolete old farts and run long winded, high power, weiner roasting, AM!!! Let the Calling All Powerlines "CAP" contests begin! My henry console is jumping around squeaking and beeping like R2D2 just itching to join the fight against the dark side. MK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Keith" wrote in message ... | "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message but BPL | can be shut down by amateur operators who will, inevitably, need to use | a higher power. (insert evil grin here) | | Lets all become obsolete old farts and run long winded, high power, | weiner roasting, AM!!! Let the Calling All Powerlines "CAP" contests | begin! My henry console is jumping around squeaking and beeping like | R2D2 just itching to join the fight against the dark side. MK Perfect! Wiiiiideband AM, maybe 10 KHz wide, for that sweet, high - fidelity sound. Of course, we should all get one transmitter for every band... This idea makes the upcoming Hamfest Minnesota seem even more promising! 73, -- Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota "If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up." - Anonymous --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/04 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , starman wrote:
The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider, siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation. Or, it may be necessary to sue FCC to enforce its own regulations. -- jhhaynes at earthlink dot net |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Haynes wrote:
In article , starman wrote: The test will come when someone files a law suit against a BPL provider, siting interference to some area of the HF spectrum. Until then it's hard to say what the future of BPL will be. Hopefully the BPL industry will be discouraged by the constant threat of litigation. Or, it may be necessary to sue FCC to enforce its own regulations. That would be a class action suit I would support. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|