Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:37:02 GMT, Doug Smith W9WI
wrote: Howard wrote: Yup, if the FCC says no problem that means no problem - and of course the computer industry has given much thought to the impact to existing users of the RF spectrum .......... NOT. Doesn't look like you read the articlegrin... The article doesn't suggest BPL doesn't cause ruinous QRM. What it does suggest is that BPL is not a financially viable technology, and that rapid improvements in wireless technology have superceded it. Indeed, BPL installations in several places both in the U.S. and elsewhere have already failed for financial reasons. Doug, Did not fully read it - mea culpa. Did catch the part about it not being financially viable though. Part of what you saw was my bad attitude in general yesterday, as well as my general belief that the FCC truly hasn't taken full consideration of the BPL effects to other services. Peace, Howard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
power supply problem? | Equipment | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Problem with transient spike on Astron RS-50M Power Supply | Equipment | |||
Problem with transient spike on Astron RS-50M Power Supply | Equipment |