yojimbo wrote:

BUT....America's now safer with 380 tons of high explosives disappeared,
maybe, possibly, almost certainly for use against Americans, perhaps even
the United States itself. BUT...America is now safer. Why? 'Cos Lord Bush
sez so. Ya just gots ta bury yer head in the (quick)sand and have a little
faith.

I'm fairly certain that overall, there's a lot more explosives out there in the
world than 350 tons or 380 tons or how many tons a Canadian 'tard boy wants to
spin it.

How many tons of high explosives does Canada have? Perhaps we should make a move
to secure it?

I await your answer, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

yojimbo wrote:

snip

Whoops, turns out NBC had a news crew with the troops when they first
arrived at the site on 4/10/03, and the explosives were already gone.

http://www.drudgereport.com/nbcw.htm

"Mark S. Holden" wrote:

yojimbo wrote:

snip

Whoops, turns out NBC had a news crew with the troops when they first
arrived at the site on 4/10/03, and the explosives were already gone.

http://www.drudgereport.com/nbcw.htm

I seem to recall something along those lines in the past about that stuff
possibly already having been moved to Syria or other such places before we even
got there.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Like GE and Matt Drudge are credible authorities? LMAO!!!!

That's 20 tractor trailers full of bulk cargo. We had the area under
observation with satellites and drones. There's no way that stuff was
moved anytime in 2003 without the US knowing about it.

Matt Drudge is a raging flamer, BTW.

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:05:57 -0400, "Mark S. Holden"
wrote:

yojimbo wrote:

snip

Whoops, turns out NBC had a news crew with the troops when they first
arrived at the site on 4/10/03, and the explosives were already gone.

http://www.drudgereport.com/nbcw.htm

David wrote:

Like GE and Matt Drudge are credible authorities? LMAO!!!!

That's 20 tractor trailers full of bulk cargo. We had the area under
observation with satellites and drones. There's no way that stuff was
moved anytime in 2003 without the US knowing about it.

Matt Drudge is a raging flamer, BTW.

And, let's face it, you're just a liberal 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

Like GE and Matt Drudge are credible authorities? LMAO!!!!

That's 20 tractor trailers full of bulk cargo. We had the area under
observation with satellites and drones.

What's with the 'We' crap anyway? Ain't no way a liberal 'tard boy had anything
under observation, other than perhaps his navel, or his rectum.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"David" wrote in message
...
Like GE and Matt Drudge are credible authorities? LMAO!!!!

Like CBS? LMAO!

That's 20 tractor trailers full of bulk cargo. We had the area under
observation with satellites and drones. There's no way that stuff was
moved anytime in 2003 without the US knowing about it.

That could easily have been done, one tractor load at a time.


Matt Drudge is a raging flamer, BTW.

You would know tinkerbell.

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
| yojimbo wrote:
|
| snip
|
| Whoops, turns out NBC had a news crew with the troops when they first
| arrived at the site on 4/10/03, and the explosives were already gone.
|
| http://www.drudgereport.com/nbcw.htm

Oops!

Turns out that, according to reporter Jim Miklaszewski, the IAEA's
release of this "news item" was "highly political."

So, once again, we have the wacky Left floating more trumped - up
propaganda that has nothing to do with reality, as "proof" that "George
Bush is destroying America."

Typical.

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

Wow! Great catch!! Mik quotes an unnamed administration official. That
wouldn't be "highly politicized," would it, since the administration never
lies, not even the ones who refuse to go on record. And of course Matt
Drudge doesn't lean one way or the other does he?

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
| yojimbo wrote:
|
| snip
|
| Whoops, turns out NBC had a news crew with the troops when they first
| arrived at the site on 4/10/03, and the explosives were already gone.
|
| http://www.drudgereport.com/nbcw.htm

Oops!

Turns out that, according to reporter Jim Miklaszewski, the IAEA's
release of this "news item" was "highly political."

So, once again, we have the wacky Left floating more trumped - up
propaganda that has nothing to do with reality, as "proof" that "George
Bush is destroying America."

Typical.

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/04

yojimbo wrote:

Wow! Great catch!! Mik quotes an unnamed administration official. That
wouldn't be "highly politicized," would it, since the administration never
lies, not even the ones who refuse to go on record. And of course Matt
Drudge doesn't lean one way or the other does he?

Kerry leans so far he's about to fall over.

Come to think of it, he has fallen over several times, and he always seems to
blame someone else.

LMAO at the liberal 'tard boy from Massachusetts.

dxAce
Michigan
USA