Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There really is no "best"..... it all depends on the particular situation
and usage at the time. Generally mobile units have more power, better range and longer lasting power sources (car battery).... but you are tied to a vehicle or must lug a heavy high amp hour battery around...so they are not nearly as mobile. A portable has limited power but this often isn't a factor unless you are far from a repeater. The beauty of a portable is it's ability to pretty much go anywhere. In short you can do things with a mobile you can't acccomplish as surely with a portable.... but under certain circumstances the reverse is also true. I'd have both. Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Melland wrote:
In short you can do things with a mobile you can't acccomplish as surely with a portable.... but under certain circumstances the reverse is also true. I'd have both. Working "on a budget", I found it acceptable to use a portable and have a linear amp and 5/8-wave antenna on the car. -- Consider http://www.clifto.com/goodguys.html before you vote. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |