Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "m II" wrote in message news:nIhid.49902$E93.15072@clgrps12... uncle arnie wrote: Good news for those of who use open source products like Linux. I like Xmms for ogg. Very fast. And free. It has many advantages in compression/quality too.. http://www.vorbis.com/faq.psp I've been trying to discern differences on my portable between Ogg at a fairly high sampling rate and mp3 music files, but haven't been able to do so. Tin ear, no doubt. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:38 pm, T. Early posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM "m II" wrote in message news:nIhid.49902$E93.15072@clgrps12... uncle arnie wrote: Good news for those of who use open source products like Linux. I like Xmms for ogg. Very fast. And free. It has many advantages in compression/quality too.. http://www.vorbis.com/faq.psp I've been trying to discern differences on my portable between Ogg at a fairly high sampling rate and mp3 music files, but haven't been able to do so. Tin ear, no doubt. What I notice is faster audio start-up, and no breaks in the stream when listening on the laptop using a wireless connection to hi-speed internet. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T. Early wrote:
I've been trying to discern differences on my portable between Ogg at a fairly high sampling rate and mp3 music files, but haven't been able to do so. Tin ear, no doubt. Eh? You'll have to speak up, sonny... geezer mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|