On 06 Nov 2004 19:42:04 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

On Sat 06 Nov 2004 02:27:54p, Volker Tonn
wrote in message
:



-=jd=- schrieb:



The group name is "Rec.Radio.Shortwave", not
"Rec.Radio.Shortwave.Technical-Aspects-Only"...


There are are plenty of groups specialized to talk on
political and other topics. If you want political,
geographical or sexual talk go to the related group(s)!
Newsgroups are related on themes. And rrs is related on
_receiving_ not on _contetnt_ of transmissions. Period.
It's fine to point out what you're actually hearing on
shortwave or other freqs. But if you want to discuss on non
receiving related content make a follow-up to the related
group. Thanks.


Please refer to the previous post of mine with reference to
the newsgroup charter for a clearer understanding that
broadcast content is on topic. Thanks much!

-=jd=-

Exactly. It's my pleasure to "cross the aisle" and to agree with an
excellent example of a thinking conservative on this issue of content.

Otherwise, this interesting and challenging list could devolve into a
bunch of ******s discussing their rigs.

The self-appointed Wouff-Hongs, like JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome,
are free to ignore the posts that do not meet their needs.

And, oh yeah, keep listening, and 73,

BB

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 20:20:28 GMT, Bradley B.
wrote:

Otherwise, this interesting and challenging list could devolve into a
bunch of ******s discussing their rigs.

Just to clarify... Not that there is anything wrong with that. Just
that the DIVERSITY of what is discussed here produces a more lively
microcosm.

bb