It also had sweet audio in general. I only got
to play with one for a couple of weeks, but man,
the thing I remember the most was the audio.

--Mike L.


"John Barnard" wrote in message
...
The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep
the circuits
aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will
have vernier
tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory
(I don't have
it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and
R-390A and they
all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is
that they
often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting
leaky and sometimes
it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A).
If you get a
chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy!

73

John Barnard

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite
feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you
encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The
receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out
man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it
also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may
consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a
sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can
be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference
points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow
weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways
liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC
NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any
questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing
to you, Gary

I like how the HQ-180 lights up the shack at night ...........GC



"Michael Lawson" wrote in message
...
It also had sweet audio in general. I only got
to play with one for a couple of weeks, but man,
the thing I remember the most was the audio.

--Mike L.


"John Barnard" wrote in message
...
The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep
the circuits
aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will
have vernier
tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory
(I don't have
it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and
R-390A and they
all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is
that they
often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting
leaky and sometimes
it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A).
If you get a
chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy!

73

John Barnard

Kachina 78 wrote:

Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite
feature, is
the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you
encounter the
need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The
receiver has a low
noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out
man-made hash. The
smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it
also helps
when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may
consider
it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a
sturdy bench
in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can
be a
problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference
points on each
band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow
weary of the
need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways
liked this
feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC
NRD-535D, which sits
next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any
questions about the
HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing
to you, Gary

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:23:28 GMT, "george craig"
wrote:

I like how the HQ-180 lights up the shack at night ...........GC


And warms it too!!!! :-)

The thing about the HQ 180 I didn't like was the lack of accurate frequency
read out and the radio woud drift... but it was the technology of the
time.....GC




"Sniper" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:23:28 GMT, "george craig"
wrote:

I like how the HQ-180 lights up the shack at night ...........GC


And warms it too!!!! :-)

George Craig hath opined:

The thing about the HQ 180 I didn't like was the lack of accurate frequency
read out and the radio woud drift... but it was the technology of the
time.....GC

I don't recall any of the '50s-'60s Hammarlunds as drifty, but then there are a
lot of things I don't recall from that period. My 145AX, 170A, and 180AX hardly
drift after warmup.

As for readout, my first ham receiver was a Zenith Transoceanic. Not only did
it not have a BFO, meaning I had to read CW from the presence or lack of a
carrier, but the whole of the Novice portion of 40M couldn't have been more
than a quarter-inch wide. The dial pointer took up a fair chunk of that. The
Hammarlunds of the era felt like they had infinite bandspread by comparison.
Interpolating to within a few kHz was plenty for me.

Now, of course, digital has spoiled all of us, including me. But when I get
away from my Grundig Satellit 800 and Sony 7600 and back to my boatanchors, I
feel like I've gotten home from high school in the afternoon and it's time for
some serious knob-twiddling.

Cheers,
Avery W3AVE
Potomac, Md.

The HQ 180 is a good band cruser, but I was spoiled with my 51J3 and racal
6217A ... to me it takes alot of skill to design a good analog radio.....no
phase
noise or birdies like a digital radio.......I still like how the HQ 180
light up the room at night....GC



"AComarow" wrote in message
...
George Craig hath opined:

The thing about the HQ 180 I didn't like was the lack of accurate
frequency
read out and the radio woud drift... but it was the technology of the
time.....GC

I don't recall any of the '50s-'60s Hammarlunds as drifty, but then there
are a
lot of things I don't recall from that period. My 145AX, 170A, and 180AX
hardly
drift after warmup.

As for readout, my first ham receiver was a Zenith Transoceanic. Not only
did
it not have a BFO, meaning I had to read CW from the presence or lack of a
carrier, but the whole of the Novice portion of 40M couldn't have been
more
than a quarter-inch wide. The dial pointer took up a fair chunk of that.
The
Hammarlunds of the era felt like they had infinite bandspread by
comparison.
Interpolating to within a few kHz was plenty for me.

Now, of course, digital has spoiled all of us, including me. But when I
get
away from my Grundig Satellit 800 and Sony 7600 and back to my
boatanchors, I
feel like I've gotten home from high school in the afternoon and it's time
for
some serious knob-twiddling.

Cheers,
Avery W3AVE
Potomac, Md.