Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It also had sweet audio in general. I only got
to play with one for a couple of weeks, but man, the thing I remember the most was the audio. --Mike L. "John Barnard" wrote in message ... The HQ-180 is a very nice radio and they work quite well if you keep the circuits aligned properly. Depending upon the production number some will have vernier tuning (mine doesn't) and there was an IF noise immunizer acessory (I don't have it). My 4 main receivers are the Drake R-8B, HQ-180C, SP-600 and R-390A and they all see a fair bit of use. The biggest problem with "boatanchors" is that they often need to be recapped due to some of the capacitors getting leaky and sometimes it is just a good preventative measure (especially with the R-390A). If you get a chance to play around with one sit back and enjoy! 73 John Barnard Kachina 78 wrote: Leonard, It has many more good points vs. bad points. My favorite feature, is the Slot Frequency control, which really comes in handy when you encounter the need to eliminate adjacent or co-channel interference. The receiver has a low noise floor, and a great noise limiter circuit, to knock out man-made hash. The smooth bandspread tuning capacitor, is a pleasure to use, and it also helps when you're trying to pull a weak signal out of the muck. Some may consider it's size and weight a bad point, but if you have the room and a sturdy bench in the shack, it's not a problem. Main tuning dial calibration can be a problem, but the crystal oscillator helps to establish reference points on each band, so you know what frequency you're tuned into. Some may grow weary of the need to peak the antenna trimmer for each band, but I've allways liked this feature in a receiver. My HQ-180 often outperforms my JRC NRD-535D, which sits next to it, and that says a lot in itself. If you have any questions about the HQ-180, send me an e-mail, and I'll try to answer them. Good DXing to you, Gary |