| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:20:09 GMT, m II
wrote: Is the Superheterodyne set over rated? It seems to me there were certain advantages to the OLD ways. Ease of control perhaps not being one of them. Actually, superheterodyne is a pretty "OLD" way. It's just that it has not been surpassed - till now, with the SDR - Software-Defined Radio (of which superheterodyne is the front end anyway). What was the WORST feature of the Regenerative sets? Selectivity, dynamic range, tricky adjustment. The BEST feature? Simplicity, cost. Would it be worthwhile to build a kit? It is *always* worthwhile to tinker with radios... ;-) Mike |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
| a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||