Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:23:49 GMT, "Frank Dresser"
wrote: Interference aside, BPL would be a slick solution if it's reliable. However, there hasn't been much evidence that BPL can deliver wide bandwidth to a significant number of customers over a long period of time. Now, I have seen just the opposite reported. Speeds lower than typical, contemporary DSL/Cable with more susceptibility to intereference. To note, it wont really be able to increase its throughput once big companies like Verizon have mostly implemented their FIOS (fiber) service at opening speeds at 5 Mbps downstream, 15Mbps and 30 Mbps downstream options as well. The techonology wont allow for it to be competitive business-wise. This all works against the money greedy pigs at the FCC/Power Companies' lies about QRM on the RF spectrum slated to be used. |