Honus wrote:

So, Steve, do you dress up in women's clothing when using the 'JuLiE'
moniker? I'll bet you do...you poor sick twisted individual you...


You know, you almost sound......excited.


You would be too, if YOU were on the verge of a great discovery...or,
in this case, UNCOVERY. Nothing to do with sex.

It has to be that, as any sexual drive has been non existent since my
private parts were obliterated in a horrendous Hydrogen Peroxide
explosion at the Peenemunde rocket research centre. I sacrificed
myself and any future progeny in order to shield Von Braun. The rest
is history.

All that notwithstanding, I agree with Bradley B's observation of
'JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome'. Whatever Steve Lare does during his
quiet moments is entirely up to him.



mike

"m II" wrote in message
news:R9Zld.99797$VA5.1471@clgrps13...
Honus wrote:

So, Steve, do you dress up in women's clothing when using the 'JuLiE'
moniker? I'll bet you do...you poor sick twisted individual you...


You know, you almost sound......excited.


You would be too, if YOU were on the verge of a great discovery...or,
in this case, UNCOVERY. Nothing to do with sex.

It has to be that, as any sexual drive has been non existent since my
private parts were obliterated in a horrendous Hydrogen Peroxide
explosion at the Peenemunde rocket research centre. I sacrificed
myself and any future progeny in order to shield Von Braun. The rest
is history.

All that notwithstanding, I agree with Bradley B's observation of
'JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome'. Whatever Steve Lare does during his
quiet moments is entirely up to him.



mike

What the hell are you guys talking about?

B.H.

Brian Hill wrote:

What the hell are you guys talking about?


I don't have a clue. I was just playing along.




mike

"m II" wrote in message
news:Rddmd.178713$9b.87738@edtnps84...
Brian Hill wrote:

What the hell are you guys talking about?


I don't have a clue. I was just playing along.

I wonder if he was asking about the bit where you said:

"All that notwithstanding, I agree with Bradley B's observation of
'JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome'."

Just what exactly was Bradley's observation?

Honus wrote:


Bradley B responded to jd in another part of a 'JuLiE! Threat or
Menace?' thread.

The reference to Wouff-Hongs piqued my curiosity. I found this as a
result.

http://www.kkn.net/archives/html/QRP.../msg00582.html

This site obviously wants to cloud the issue:

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/04/01/1/


There seems to be something worthwhile in even the most obscure of
postings..



BB's message:
=========================
Please refer to the previous post of mine with reference to
the newsgroup charter for a clearer understanding that
broadcast content is on topic. Thanks much!

-=jd=-

Exactly. It's my pleasure to "cross the aisle" and to agree with an
excellent example of a thinking conservative on this issue of content.

Otherwise, this interesting and challenging list could devolve into a
bunch of ******s discussing their rigs.

The self-appointed Wouff-Hongs, like JuLiE-of-the-mystery-chromosome,
are free to ignore the posts that do not meet their needs.

And, oh yeah, keep listening, and 73,

BB

==========================

"m II" wrote in message
news:kjemd.103274$VA5.93351@clgrps13...
Honus wrote:


Bradley B responded to jd in another part of a 'JuLiE! Threat or
Menace?' thread.

The reference to Wouff-Hongs piqued my curiosity. I found this as a
result.

http://www.kkn.net/archives/html/QRP.../msg00582.html

This site obviously wants to cloud the issue:

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/04/01/1/


There seems to be something worthwhile in even the most obscure of
postings..

You know, every now and then I agree with you. I'm learning to cope with it
though, thanks to the group therapy.

Honus wrote:

You know, every now and then I agree with you. I'm learning to cope with it
though, thanks to the group therapy.





g

"m II" wrote in message
news:kjemd.103274$VA5.93351@clgrps13...
Honus wrote:


Bradley B responded to jd in another part of a 'JuLiE! Threat or
Menace?' thread.

The reference to Wouff-Hongs piqued my curiosity. I found this as a
result.

http://www.kkn.net/archives/html/QRP.../msg00582.html

This site obviously wants to cloud the issue:

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/04/01/1/


There seems to be something worthwhile in even the most obscure of
postings..



Yea I've heard all kinds of strange stories about the Wouff Hong. Theres
also some other evil apperati called I think the Rettisnich or Rettysnitch ?


--
73 and good DXing.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire!
Zumbrota, Southern MN
Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/

EMAIL-
(Hide the $100 to reply!)

Genuine Wouff-Hong and the Rettysnitch at URL:
http://www.cebik.com/wouf.html

--
The Anon Keyboard
I doubt, therefore I might be



Somone wrote
The reference to Wouff-Hongs piqued my curiosity. I found this as a
result.

http://www.kkn.net/archives/html/QRP.../msg00582.html

This site obviously wants to cloud the issue:

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/04/01/1/


There seems to be something worthwhile in even the most obscure of
postings..



Yea I've heard all kinds of strange stories about the Wouff Hong. Theres
also some other evil apperati called I think the Rettisnich or Rettysnitch
?

"m II" wrote in message
news:Rddmd.178713$9b.87738@edtnps84...
Brian Hill wrote:

What the hell are you guys talking about?


I don't have a clue. I was just playing along.




mike

I do that when I'm bored too.

B.H.