Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() They are both good radios. The Receptor can have a little too much false bass response on talk radio stations. I used to feel that way about the bass also. Especially when placed in the corner of a room. But my ear has learned to like it. At lower volume the bass is not so exagerated. For music it definately fills the room. I like the digital tuning and 20 memories slots on the Receptor along with the alarm clock(s). I like the looks of the Model One but dislike fumbling around for stations without my glasses. The Recepter ergonomics and digital tuning is nice. I feel Heenry Kloss was just too much a purest when it came to audio - avoided any use of digital circuits as much as possible to reduce internally generated hash. Of which I can hear none on the Recepter. I have opened mine out of curiousity and found the entire RF section to be inside a shielded box away from the digital circuitry. The model One does a nice job tuned into a NJ 1160 AM big band station she listens to all the time. For locals any radio will do. But it is well known that the Tivoli is not a very hot AM receiver. If you have $5 to waste head to a Family Dollar Store or WalMart and look for the Lennox sport radio, your choice of multiple colors in a blister pack. The AM performance for $5 and a couple of AA cells will surprise you . LOL! So why did you buy the Recepter and convince your Mother-In-Law? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|