| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Eavesdropping on your child is illegal!
"Da-man" wrote in message .verio.net... It is time for the parents to reclaim the home and the rule IN that home. And just how do we fight Big Brother without committing suicide? They all have nearly absolute immunity, for the most part. It's near impossible to sue them successfully. Judges, prosecutors, social workers, police... They're hell bent on raising our kids for us or preventing us from raising them. And after all, they have plenty of OUR money to use against us. And if they don't fight us the ACLU will. DeWayne B.S.; - This **** will be thrown out of court.. ( Then again, if your kids 45 or so..) |
I do believe , if you think, your kids a gonna git in a bit of trouble, it behooves you to pry a bit, - rather than have a 3 A.M. call from the cops of a tearful, ( Hysterical ) announcement that Biology has taken its un interrupted course.. erio.net "bpnjensen" wrote in message roups.com... A good home will not guarantee a problem-free child - but a bad home will almost certainly guarantee a problematic child. I've seen to many examples to not have this opinion. Given the odds, I'll pick door number one. But the man claiming to be an expert is claiming that a "GOOD" home will reap a good child - every time! HE IS WRONG.... That is all we're saying. Oh, and by the way - there is NOTHING to suggest that the woman who scolded her child and was subsequently threatened made any attempts earlier to properly raise her child with due respect for her elders and the law. You cannot just pick an isolated incident and say, "There, see?" without some context. There are many incidents like this around the country daily, I can assure you. I used that example only to show the mother was threatened when she was only trying to tell her daughter right from wrong, so she wouldn't end up in trouble. What kind of mother would she have been to condone it???? And yes, I did forget one point, the items stolen were taken back with the girl in tow to apologize. The store owner was very understanding. It wasn't the mothers fault the child stole. She trusted her daughter to go to the store for her. The younger sister knew it was wrong to steal! She knew to tell her mother about it. The mother raised her children right. She was a damned good mother to those girls. I know what she did for those kids. She did everything she could for them. You can't fault the parents automatically, that just isn't fair. You're starting to sound like the other guy - it's "always" the parents fault. NO it is not. My parents did their best with me. IF I grew up to be a criminal, that is on me, not them. I KNOW the job they did. The few things I DID do as a child - learning by my mistakes, I hurt my parents feelings - I let them down and they didn't deserve it. I was no angel as a child. In one case, as is so prevalent today, I got in with the wrong crowd. PEER PRESSURE. But I learned quick - they weren't good company. I had some understanding adults show me right from wrong. On the other matter, regarding people who have abused our laws to make it impossible for people to act responsible in traditional ways without ear of retribution - you have my wholehearted agreement. I do not use or condone corporal punishment, but a parent must have an arsenal of reasonable disciplinary tactics that she can use use to adjust her child's behavior. Bruce Jensen I just can not accept the policy of "all" parents are the fault. But there are no easy answers. This society is getting worse every day. DM |
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:14:06 GMT, "DeWayne" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message oups.com... DeWayne, This is a Washington State Supreme Court Ruling that applies 'only' to the 'state of washington' [.] What the good people of the State of Washington should do (need-to-do) is Impeach each-and-everyone of these HIGH and MIGHTY State Supreme Court Judges. [ Send a Message to Their Elected and 'Appointed' Public Officials: "We The People Are In-Charge." ] We did this {Impeached} in the State of California with "Her Majesty" Rose Bird and put these 'little pontifs' On-Notice. I would like to read the details about this. Google has already done all your reading for you. |
Eavesdropping on your child (or your children) is NOT! wrong and
Definetly NOT! illegal! Who says it is illegal? fed govt!? fed govt creates the problem(s) and fed govt steps in to "try" to solve the problem(s) I Never believe Anything fed govt says is true.Old saying goes,If their lips are moving,They are Lieing! cuhulin |
But then I don't have any kids so that does not make me a parenting
expert either. cuhulin |
King County,Washington,left coast,,, folks who own property/land,can not
build on more than ten percent of their property/land.Oregon and Washington (Washington state,that is) used to be decent states untill back in the 1970's them weirdos from California started moving up there and messed everything up for Oregon and Washington. cuhulin |
wrote in message ... Eavesdropping on your child (or your children) is NOT! wrong and Definetly NOT! illegal! Um, wrong. If the courts rule it is illegal, then by definition it is illegal. An example of how a court can legally make a law. Who says it is illegal? fed govt!? fed govt creates the problem(s) and fed govt steps in to "try" to solve the problem(s) I Never believe Anything fed govt says is true.Old saying goes,If their lips are moving,They are Lieing! cuhulin |
Um, wrong. If the courts rule it is illegal, then by definition it is
illegal. An example of how a court can legally make a law. No, courts can't do that. If a court finds that something is illegal, then it is finding that someone broke a law, it is not making a law. |
"Brian Running" wrote in message ... Um, wrong. If the courts rule it is illegal, then by definition it is illegal. An example of how a court can legally make a law. No, courts can't do that. If a court finds that something is illegal, then it is finding that someone broke a law, it is not making a law. Not true at all. Take a basic college political science class. You are talking about statutory law. Our constitution and many laws are very loosely written in order to stay relavent. It is the job of the courts to take that framework and interperet what is legal and illegal. This is called common law. Once a ruling is made, stare decisis requires other courts to apply this ruling to any similar cases. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com