"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:18:37 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"m II" wrote in message
news:4K4yd.12763$nN6.4438@edtnps84...


I must express my deepest disdain for the way you treat the cranially
infirm and the hard of thinking in this group.

Oh, come on now. I've never been that hard on you. ;)



haha...I see you make friends quick.....you and m II in the BJ room...

For crying out loud, why does every post you make have some reference to gay
blow jobs in it? Obsessing, are we?

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:49:05 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"beerbarrel" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:36:31 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


And it's sad that that's your best retort.




I think that about sums it up....I've never heard of that group but
you know where it is! Sounds like you hang out there. Waiting on
brybaby II are ya?

Is that really supposed to pass for repartee? Sheesh...most fathers teach
their kids to not show up for gun fights with knives. You came
empty-handed.
My feelings would be hurt by your lack of effort, but since I see that
everyone else ends up handing you your ass as well I realize that you're
doing your best.


maybe so but it ain't been you!

And the fact that I'm not handling your ass saddens you, does it?

The bottom line is that someone mentioned another man gaining super
powers,
and the first thought you shared with us was something about him possibly
being able to give incredible blow jobs. Where's your head? (See, that
works
on so many levels; I'm guessing you can grasp about a third.)

Take some friendly advice, and walk.

Hmmm...you seem to be the one that knew where to go! Were you
dreaming out loud?

There's nothing wrong with visiting that or any other group, or dreaming
aloud. I'm just increasingly distressed by your -constant- references to
homosexual behavior, which you feebly attempt to counter with an occasional
jab against homosexuals. I think that you're in some sort of internal
conflict, I fear for your mental health, and I urge you to accept yourself
and be who you are. There's no shame.

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:34:51 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"beerbarrel" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:18:37 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"m II" wrote in message
news:4K4yd.12763$nN6.4438@edtnps84...


I must express my deepest disdain for the way you treat the
cranially
infirm and the hard of thinking in this group.

Oh, come on now. I've never been that hard on you. ;)



haha...I see you make friends quick.....you and m II in the BJ room...

For crying out loud, why does every post you make have some reference to
gay
blow jobs in it? Obsessing, are we?



Inquiring minds want to know? How did you figure out what group to go
to? Your too stupid to figure out usenet!

And you're too stupid to configure your browser properly, amongst other
things. Again, I didn't direct you to a homosexual newsgroup. I directed you
to a daydreaming group which doesn't even exist...and I think that's why
you're so angry with me.

You tried to join it, didn't you?

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...

Last night with you mom was as close to a man as I wanted to get! Oh
it still turns my stomach...

I'd imagine so. She died last August.

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:49:03 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:

There's nothing wrong with visiting that or any other group, or dreaming
aloud. I'm just increasingly distressed by your -constant- references to
homosexual behavior, which you feebly attempt to counter with an
occasional
jab against homosexuals. I think that you're in some sort of internal
conflict, I fear for your mental health, and I urge you to accept
yourself
and be who you are. There's no shame.

I can see that you are having a hard time losing. I would figure that
you would be accustomed to losing by now.

Please, try to be funny, huh? This is going nowhere fast. Not everybody
appreciates my brand of humor, but I'm betting no one appreciates yours.
(Pssst...now's the time to fabricate a sock puppet, and post using it to
support yourself.) If the quality of your jibes doesn't improve soon, I
might have to surrender the field to you just to preserve my honor. People
like you need to be defended and protected, not picked on.

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:34:30 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"beerbarrel" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:49:03 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:

There's nothing wrong with visiting that or any other group, or
dreaming
aloud. I'm just increasingly distressed by your -constant- references
to
homosexual behavior, which you feebly attempt to counter with an
occasional
jab against homosexuals. I think that you're in some sort of internal
conflict, I fear for your mental health, and I urge you to accept
yourself
and be who you are. There's no shame.

I can see that you are having a hard time losing. I would figure that
you would be accustomed to losing by now.

Please, try to be funny, huh? This is going nowhere fast. Not everybody
appreciates my brand of humor, but I'm betting no one appreciates yours.
(Pssst...now's the time to fabricate a sock puppet, and post using it to
support yourself.) If the quality of your jibes doesn't improve soon, I
might have to surrender the field to you just to preserve my honor.
People
like you need to be defended and protected, not picked on.


I've read some of your past usenet posts and I know why you are mad.

Then you'd also know that I'm not gay, and that I'm not narrow either. In
which case accusing me of being gay has no effect. I simply don't see it as
an insult, even coming from you.

You are a homosexual aren't you? Sorry I offended you with the BJ
comment. I know that is something personal between you and your lover.

Sorry...

Lord! Not only are you NOT funny, you can't come up with your own material!
I've been using that tactic on you all night; find your own approach.

Oh, and speaking of homosexuals and your obvious obsession...why do you have
that dirty word in your e-mail address? What are you trying to tell the
world? Are you going to claim that it's all just an unfortunate coincidence?

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:27:34 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:


"beerbarrel" wrote in message
.. .

Last night with you mom was as close to a man as I wanted to get! Oh
it still turns my stomach...

I'd imagine so. She died last August.



Hell, she is probably glad to be away from you! Don't ya think? So you
started work on Seattle Slew's backside yet?

I'm sorry beerbarrel, but it's no secret that I live in Seattle. Everybody
that's paid any attention knows it...and I sure you hope you're not trying
to impress with your skill at www.google.com.

Honus wrote:

(snipped)


The old adage is applicable here.


Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it.





mike

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 03:55:13 GMT, "Honus"
wrote:

Oh, and speaking of homosexuals and your obvious obsession...why do you
have
that dirty word in your e-mail address? What are you trying to tell the
world? Are you going to claim that it's all just an unfortunate
coincidence?




Squim as you will, your gay and you can't handle the truth.

I almost wish I was, just to get even further under your skin. Not
literally, though. Don't go and start typing with just one hand, now.

This is a great post from you...

Wow! Thanks for all of the info!! It's kind of funny...I never thought
about elephant testicles, or the fact that despite frequent visits to
the local zoo I've never observed any. They'd be hard to miss, after
all.

But you looked didn't you Seattle Slew? Your into animals too!

Oh, beerbelly...that's really sad. I had to look that one up. Just to bring
everyone up to date, that's a response that I made in 1998 to a post to a
biologist that I used to know about the fact that most mammals have external
testes. The argument was that contrary to fundamentalist Christian belief,
we're not all that well designed. One of the flaws pointed out by yours
truly was external testicles. If I were the almighty creator, I'd have had a
bit more compassion for my male creations than to leave their pills outside
like that. My biologist acquaintance pointed out the fact that some mammals,
elephants included, have internal testes, showing that God could surely have
done it for us if he'd so desired. He gave me quite a detailed response that
clearly sailed right over beerbelly's head, which is probably partly why he
took my quote out of context. And he says that I have no credibility?
Anyway, the thread's at google for all to see, I stand by it, and it's
actually quite interesting. I encourage people to go there and read it.
(BTW...whales have internal nuts as well. Lucky *******s.)

Here...I'll throw in a little of my friend's post, massively snipped for
brevity. It really is interesting reading, and I'm equally sure that
beerbelly ignored it all.

begin

Yes, the term for it is apparently "testicond". One familiar example is the
Cetacea [streamlined whales & dolphins would look pretty silly with dangly
bits]

Others include monotremes, hyraxes, elephants, manatees, anteaters and
sloths,
& various Insectivora


It seems that some are primitively testicond, but others are secondarily so
[example: cetacea].


The first 2 papers listed below seem to offer alternative hypotheses for
scrotum evolution:


TI On the cause of the mammalian descent of the testes (descensus
testiculorum).
AU FREY-R
SO ZEITSCHRIFT FUER ZOOLOGISCHE SYSTEMATIK UND EVOLUTIONSFORSCHUNG 29(1):
40-65
PY 1991
LS In Ger. with Ger. and Engl. summ.
AB Two explanations have been offered for the descent of the testes in
mammals,
both of which are frequently cited in the literature. MOORE and co-workers
argued that the phylogenetic rise of body temperature caused the
translocation
of the testes. According to PORTMANN, the descent of the testes was due to
the
evolution of the scrotum as a signal. However, both the sensibility of the
extra-abdominal testes to temperature elevations and the optical effects of
the
scrotum can be interpreted as a consequence of testicular descent rather
than
as its cause.

end snipped

"m II" wrote in message
news:zt6yd.6379$uj2.2610@clgrps12...
Honus wrote:

(snipped)


The old adage is applicable here.


Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it.

He does seem to be enjoying himself a little too much. As for myself, it's
time to bow out. This is way off topic, and getting out of hand. If he was
something more of an intellectual challenge I'd be tempted to stay the
course, indeed I'd -have- to stay just to show I hadn't lost; but as it
stands I'm just going to look like an ass for beating up on the simpleton.