OT How close are we to true fascism? How did we get here?
 

DaxiD,

I am sure that within your Mind "True Fascism" Exists.
..
Fortunately 'we' do not have to live within "Your" Mind.
..
DaviD - It may be a mad,,, Mad... MAD !!! World . . .
But We Do Not Have To Go Crazy Thinking About It [.]
..
..
something to think about ~ RHF
..
..

''In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a
conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a
nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz
Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and
patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of
traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes
President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the
viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus
Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic"
laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. ''

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0719-15.htm


On 25 Dec 2004 22:06:44 -0800, "RHF"
wrote:

DaxiD,

I am sure that within your Mind "True Fascism" Exists.
.
Fortunately 'we' do not have to live within "Your" Mind.
.
DaviD - It may be a mad,,, Mad... MAD !!! World . . .
But We Do Not Have To Go Crazy Thinking About It [.]
.
.
something to think about ~ RHF
.
.

David wrote:

''In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a
conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a
nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz
Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and
patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of
traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes
President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the
viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus
Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic"
laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. ''

Of course you meant to say that he fled to CanaDuh.

You're getting off to a roaring start today 'tard boy. Keep it up.

LMAO at the delusional 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DaviD,
..
Let me check my Calender - Yep its 2004 (almost 2005).
..
But you are right in 1935 we had FDR as the US President
and during his administration, he did set up Interment Camps.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/fr32.html
..
not just something out of a fictional book
but the hard truth and reality of history ~ RHF
..
..

I am a Conservative Southron old Republican boy.Gawd almighty! I shudder
to think if TRAITOR! al gourdhead or TRAITOR!!! kerry had got elected!
cuhulin

You'd rather have a Connecticut Yankee who pretends to be a cowboy?

Consider, for just a few seconds, that you have been lied to by the
corporate elites, and that they (not the ''liberals'') control the
media and use it to keep you in the dark about what's really going on.

On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:49:46 -0600, wrote:

I am a Conservative Southron old Republican boy.Gawd almighty! I shudder
to think if TRAITOR! al gourdhead or TRAITOR!!! kerry had got elected!
cuhulin

David wrote:

You'd rather have a Connecticut Yankee who pretends to be a cowboy?

What the heck, you pretend to be sane, 'tard boy.

Now go tote it and get the hell out of here.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

You'd rather have a Connecticut Yankee who pretends to be a cowboy?

You'd rather have a Massachusetts 'tard boy who pretends to be a hero?

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

m II wrote:

wrote:

I am a Conservative Southron old Republican boy.Gawd almighty! I shudder
to think if TRAITOR! al gourdhead or TRAITOR!!! kerry had got elected!
cuhulin

Would you say you are an average, typical American?

Would you say that you are representative of the typical 'tard from CanaDuh?

You and Rickets really need to get together. Compare notes on toting, and your
respective doses of medications.

Oh, by the way, have a happy Boxing Day.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DaviD,
..
While you are an Uber Liberal ELITIST who pretends to be Enlighten ;-}
..
something to think about ~ RHF
..
..

Explain my Uber Liberal Leftist tendencies, please.

I'll cop to supporting Social Security in its current form and top to
bottom restructuring of Health Care insurance, but those are both
pretty much up the middle ideas, politically.

Where are these radical ''liberal'' ideas I'm promoting?

On 26 Dec 2004 13:38:43 -0800, "RHF"
wrote:

DaviD,
.
While you are an Uber Liberal ELITIST who pretends to be Enlighten ;-}
.
something to think about ~ RHF
.
.

David wrote:

Explain my Uber Liberal Leftist tendencies, please.

I'll cop to supporting Social Security in its current form and top to
bottom restructuring of Health Care insurance, but those are both
pretty much up the middle ideas, politically.

Where are these radical ''liberal'' ideas I'm promoting?

Still don't get it do you, 'tard boy?

Are you really that frickin stupid?

(The answer of course, is YES)

Please, hit the damn road.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DaviD,
..
You see - You Don't See - Because You are Blinded by your own Beliefs.
..
Social Security is BROKEN [.]
..
Social Security Needs FIXING [.]
..
The Chileans Did It !
..
The Germans are 'trying' to Do It.
..
We (the USofA) had better Get To Work - Now !
..
so say i - my opinions stated as facts ~ RHF
..
..

Where are y'all coming from, anyway. Since when is defecit spending
OK with the ''conservatives''? Don't you think it's at all possible
that Bush is just doing a massive wealth transfer from working people
to the idle rich?

''In about 13 years, the system is projected to start paying out more
in benefits than it collects in benefits. Then, the government must
start repaying the excess Social Security funds it already has spent.
With the repaid funds, the system can cover full benefits until 2042,
according to the forecast by Social Security's Board of Trustees. The
Congressional Budget Office (news - web sites) predicted the system is
in better shape and probably can pay full benefits a decade longer.''
--ap


On 26 Dec 2004 16:54:50 -0800, "RHF"
wrote:

DaviD,
.
You see - You Don't See - Because You are Blinded by your own Beliefs.
.
Social Security is BROKEN [.]
.
Social Security Needs FIXING [.]
.
The Chileans Did It !
.
The Germans are 'trying' to Do It.
.
We (the USofA) had better Get To Work - Now !
.
so say i - my opinions stated as facts ~ RHF
.
.

dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

''In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a
conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a
nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz
Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and
patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of
traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes
President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the
viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus
Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic"
laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. ''

Of course you meant to say that he fled to CanaDuh.

You're getting off to a roaring start today 'tard boy. Keep it up.

LMAO at the delusional 'tard.

So you agree that it should be illegal to criticize the President? Or
that anybody who dares to criticize the President should move to
"CanaDuh" and get out of the way of "patriotic" Americans?


dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

You'd rather have a Connecticut Yankee who pretends to be a cowboy?

You'd rather have a Massachusetts 'tard boy who pretends to be a hero?

He went to Vietnam. Your "hero" Bush didn't. Bush used his family's
influence to get out of going, while Kerry, who could have done the same
thing (he's related to one of the most powerful families in
Massachusetts), didn't. Forget about awards and such. Kerry went to war
and Bush weaseled out. That is a fact. Who's more courageous?


LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

running dogg wrote:

dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

''In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a
conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a
nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz
Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and
patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of
traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes
President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the
viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus
Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic"
laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. ''

Of course you meant to say that he fled to CanaDuh.

You're getting off to a roaring start today 'tard boy. Keep it up.

LMAO at the delusional 'tard.

So you agree that it should be illegal to criticize the President?

Where did I ever, ever say that, 'tard boy? Show me.

Or
that anybody who dares to criticize the President should move to
"CanaDuh" and get out of the way of "patriotic" Americans?

Where did I ever, ever say that, 'tard boy? Show me.

You get back to me when you can show me that. Until then, get those meds
straightened out. You know the ones. Those that make you see things, and read
things that are not there.

Get a grip.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

Since the 2000 election, Sweetheart.

Bush won in 2000, and by golly he won again in 2004.

Get over it, 'tard.

Now go tote it on your way to assisting in making more bad TV.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

No. He did not win in 2000. That has been proven. He is an
illegitimate pretender.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:06:25 -0500, dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

Since the 2000 election, Sweetheart.

Bush won in 2000, and by golly he won again in 2004.

Get over it, 'tard.

Now go tote it on your way to assisting in making more bad TV.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

No. He did not win in 2000. That has been proven. He is an
illegitimate pretender.

Proven where, 'tard boy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA



On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:06:25 -0500, dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

Since the 2000 election, Sweetheart.

Bush won in 2000, and by golly he won again in 2004.

Get over it, 'tard.

Now go tote it on your way to assisting in making more bad TV.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blo...gore_or_w.html

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:46:43 -0500, dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

No. He did not win in 2000. That has been proven. He is an
illegitimate pretender.

Proven where, 'tard boy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA



On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:06:25 -0500, dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

Since the 2000 election, Sweetheart.

Bush won in 2000, and by golly he won again in 2004.

Get over it, 'tard.

Now go tote it on your way to assisting in making more bad TV.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

You should know by now 'tard boy that I generally don't read the BS you post!

Wake up! Take your meds!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Read my comments to runningdoggggg

It's pretty obvious you don't read much of anything.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:25:41 -0500, dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

You should know by now 'tard boy that I generally don't read the BS you post!

Wake up! Take your meds!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

It's pretty obvious you don't read much of anything.

Oh really?

LMAO at the poor delusional 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

It's pretty obvious you don't read much of anything.

Did Santa bring you a shovel for Christmas?

You're digging yourself a pretty deep hole.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

It's pretty obvious you don't read much of anything.


Forget it, David. There's no sense in responding to him. It's a
complete waste of time on your part. Continue on as before, but don't
waste your energy.

Even his two or three memorized insults are so boring that I, among
countless others, have given up on him. A close to terminal
Parkinson's case has more to offer than he does AND they deserve
respect at the same time.

Drop the loser.




mike


--
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

Terry Pratchett

running dogg wrote:

dxAce wrote:



David wrote:

You'd rather have a Connecticut Yankee who pretends to be a cowboy?

You'd rather have a Massachusetts 'tard boy who pretends to be a hero?

He went to Vietnam. Your "hero" Bush didn't. Bush used his family's
influence to get out of going, while Kerry, who could have done the same
thing (he's related to one of the most powerful families in
Massachusetts), didn't. Forget about awards and such. Kerry went to war
and Bush weaseled out.

Weaselled out? How is joining the National Guard weaseling out? I'm certain that
numerous National Guard Veterans might take issue with your comment.

A question for you: Just exactly how have you served your country? Or are you
sitting at home on your cheeks simply bitching?

Are you courageous?

(I'm betting that you're not)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You want to read about "true" fascism?
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/4-12-9/24672.html

Read all 9 - I dare ya'!

"David" wrote in message
...
''In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a
conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a
nationally syndicated radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz
Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and
patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of
traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes
President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the
viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus
Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic"
laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. ''

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0719-15.htm


On 25 Dec 2004 22:06:44 -0800, "RHF"
wrote:

DaxiD,

I am sure that within your Mind "True Fascism" Exists.
.
Fortunately 'we' do not have to live within "Your" Mind.
.
DaviD - It may be a mad,,, Mad... MAD !!! World . . .
But We Do Not Have To Go Crazy Thinking About It [.]
.
.
something to think about ~ RHF
.
.

TIAN LI,
..
CSPAN had a recent program that featured several members
of the staff of the Epoch Times.
..
The one thing that they generally agree on was that China (PRC) was
governed by the Chinese Communist Party and that in China 'today' the
present Communist Party ELITE used the "Union" [Marriage] of State
Control and Corporate {Private} Capitalism that followed the Model set
by Mussolini in Italy in the 1930s and 1940s.
..
China Today is the Model Fascist State [.]
..
something to think about ~ RHF
..
..

My fascism's better than your fascism.

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:45:07 -0600, "tianli" wrote:

You want to read about "true" fascism?
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/4-12-9/24672.html

DaviD - That is because... You Live in a Fascist State of Mind ~ RHF

David wrote:

My fascism's better than your fascism.

Your idiocy is better than most others too, 'tard boy.

Now run along and tote it, and leave the real radio stuff to the big boys.

dxAce
Michigan
USA