Sir Cumference wrote:

dxAce wrote:


Sir Cumference wrote:


dxAce wrote:


No, this is not the first time in recorded history that India has been hit by a
tsunami. I might suggest that you do a bit of reading.

Please list the dates that tsunamis have hit India.


Why don't you go look them up? Do a little reading :-)

Rest assured, this is not the first time in recorded history that a tsunami has hit
India.

OK, so post the dates.

Sorry, you're gonna have to look it up yourself.

Do a little work.

Rest assured, this is not the first tsunami to hit India.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

OK, so post the dates.


Sorry, you're gonna have to look it up yourself.

In other words, you can't provide any dates.

Do a little work.

Rest assured, this is not the first tsunami to hit India.

I have, this is the fisrt time a tsunami has hit India. If you have a
source that proves otherwise, then post it.

Sir Cumference wrote:

dxAce wrote:

OK, so post the dates.


Sorry, you're gonna have to look it up yourself.

In other words, you can't provide any dates.

Do a little work.

Rest assured, this is not the first tsunami to hit India.

I have, this is the fisrt time a tsunami has hit India. If you have a
source that proves otherwise, then post it.

You are incorrect.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Other historic tsunamis have hit India - it isn't hard to find this on
the internet. This only accounts for the ones that have been
identified...many may have been either been too small, or misidentified
as storm surges/etc, to be recorded.

The northeast rim, in particular, of the Indian Ocean is very
seismically active - it is inconceivable that countless tsunami waves
have NOT spread across the sea south of India.

Bruce Jensen

"Sir Cumference" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:

OK, so post the dates.


Sorry, you're gonna have to look it up yourself.

In other words, you can't provide any dates.

Do a little work.

Rest assured, this is not the first tsunami to hit India.

I have, this is the fisrt time a tsunami has hit India. If you have a
source that proves otherwise, then post it.

He

http://www.asc-india.org/gq/krakatoa.htm

"One of the tsunamis, which arrived in the Tandjong Priok, Batavia (Jakarta)
at 12:36 on the 27th of August, was far larger than any of the others. These
waves had reported heights of more than 37 meters (120 feet).

They spread out into the Indian Ocean and struck the coast of India."

Here's another one:

http://www.asc-india.org/info/whattsu.htm

"According to historical records the Coromandel Coast (Coast of eastern
India), the Ganga delta and Sri Lanka have experienced tsunamis with maximum
heights of 1.5 - 2.0 meters (1941 - Andamans earthquakes, 1883 - Krakatoa
volcanic eruption)."

Here's another source, to back those up:

http://www.nio.org/jsp/tsunami.jsp

(There's a date discrepancy between the sites for the Andamans earthquake.)