RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio Communist? (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/47491-re-why-does-radio-canada-retransmit-radio-communist.html)

James Nipper January 13th 05 01:49 AM

why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio Communist?
 


Well, it IS Canada, don't you see ????




--James-- from the U.S.A.

m II January 13th 05 02:00 AM

James Nipper wrote:

Well, it IS Canada, don't you see ????



Heck, that's nothing. Bush borrows money and re election funds from the
communist Chinese. Clinton rents them rooms in the White House for cash.
Perle sells them rocket secrets..The list goes on....





mike

tianli January 13th 05 02:17 AM

Why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio China International? China seems
to
jam most western stations, why should we help them?


1) Because money rules over morality.
2) The Chinese need to spend their excess US Dollars.
3) Radio Canada needs money.

Notice that many mainland Communist China TV stations are also available
from DishNetwork.
For a subscription fee of course - which goes straight into Das Party's
coffers.



running dogg January 13th 05 02:24 AM

m II wrote:

James Nipper wrote:

Well, it IS Canada, don't you see ????



Heck, that's nothing. Bush borrows money and re election funds from the
communist Chinese. Clinton rents them rooms in the White House for cash.
Perle sells them rocket secrets..The list goes on....


Not only that, they have the entire manufacturing capacity of the WORLD
there now, so that they can bring the world to its knees simply by
cutting off the spigot. Much like the terrorists could do if they took
over Saudi Arabia.

BTW, I thought Voice of Korea was the closest thing to "Radio Communist"
there was nowadays. ;)



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

m II January 13th 05 03:01 AM

running dogg wrote:

BTW, I thought Voice of Korea was the closest thing to "Radio Communist"
there was nowadays. ;)



You are probably right about that...ever since China went Fascist with the
help of the International Corporations.





miek
..

Joel Rubin January 13th 05 03:58 AM

Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)

Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any
difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and
maybe even other broadcasts.


Robert D January 13th 05 04:02 AM

Oh my God Martha tote your portable, the Commies are taking over! You
know the first thing they do when they take over is ban Christmas then
they round up people like dxAce and cuhulin and send them to
Re-education camp where they turn them into empty-headed tards! Wait a
minute the Commies have taken over!!!


Brian Sturges January 13th 05 04:03 AM


"Conan Ford" wrote in message
3.159...
Why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio China International? China seems

to
jam most western stations, why should we help them?

I check out this and other Asian re-broadcasts on a regular basis and find
them to be very culturally oriented- rather than the political propaganda
you might expect. Listen awhile and you may find it very entertaining- in
other words; nothing like the Cuban news commentary!
Brian



m II January 13th 05 10:39 AM

Robert D wrote:

Oh my God Martha tote your portable, the Commies are taking over! You
know the first thing they do when they take over is ban Christmas then
they round up people like dxAce and cuhulin and send them to
Re-education camp where they turn them into empty-headed tards! Wait a
minute the Commies have taken over!!!


But..why would they give the dumber one a Drake? Communism makes no sense at
all.




mike

dxAce January 13th 05 11:54 AM



m II wrote:

Robert D wrote:

Oh my God Martha tote your portable, the Commies are taking over! You
know the first thing they do when they take over is ban Christmas then
they round up people like dxAce and cuhulin and send them to
Re-education camp where they turn them into empty-headed tards! Wait a
minute the Commies have taken over!!!


But..why would they give the dumber one a Drake? Communism makes no sense at
all.


'Tards in CanaDuh make no sense at all either.

LMAO at the 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



dxAce January 13th 05 12:46 PM



m II wrote:

Robert D wrote:

Oh my God Martha tote your portable, the Commies are taking over! You
know the first thing they do when they take over is ban Christmas then
they round up people like dxAce and cuhulin and send them to
Re-education camp where they turn them into empty-headed tards! Wait a
minute the Commies have taken over!!!


But..why would they give the dumber one a Drake? Communism makes no sense at
all.


And Socialism makes no sense in CanaDuh, 'tard boy.

Now go tote it, before you get tracked down.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



dxAce January 13th 05 02:15 PM



Conan Ford wrote:

Why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio China International? China seems to
jam most western stations, why should we help them?


Why does China retransmit Radio CanaDuh?

dxAce
Michigan
USA



uncle arnie January 13th 05 04:39 PM

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:27, Conan Ford posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM

Why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio China International? China seems
to jam most western stations, why should we help them?


Why do SW stations broadcast scary and silly religious nonsense: because
they sell the airtime on the open market. It's called capitalism. Same
reason that China is buying pieces of petroleum companies in North America.
It's for sale and they buy it.

China is a big and growing trading nation, and everyone wants to be friends
with those with money to spend. China is allegedly moving in a market
economy direction so friends is good and makes $.

Mark Zenier January 13th 05 06:25 PM

In article ,
Joel Rubin wrote:
Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)

Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any
difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and
maybe even other broadcasts.


Last week I was listening to the early morning BBC transmissions from
East Asia but reception sucked so I tried the local FM band to see if
one of the local educational stations was carrying it. The news bulletin
ended when I had headphones for both on my head.

(The easy way to search a band for another transmission of a current
program is to put a diferent radio in each ear and do a quick sweep of the
band. When each ear gets the same thing, you get a strange echo effect.
If you work in an open (cubicle zoo) office you can tell when somebody
in the same room calls you on the phone, even though you couldn't hear
the person over the rest of the noise).

The next program on shortwave was one of their current events blocks
running one of a multi-part series on the problems of privitization
of public utilites around the world. But the FM band program was some
sort of inspirational filler about somebody or other. I guess that PRI
didn't want to offend any free market fundamentalists.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident



bpnjensen January 13th 05 07:27 PM

I check out this and other Asian re-broadcasts on a regular basis and
find
them to be very culturally oriented- rather than the political
propaganda
you might expect. Listen awhile and you may find it very entertaining-
in
other words; nothing like the Cuban news commentary!
Brian

Agreed, and the weekend English programming from Xian to Africa
(audible here in the US, probably off the back of the beam) is a good
bet for actually being able to easily QSL a Chinese outlet - and the
programming fun and decent.

Bruce Jensen


m II January 14th 05 12:22 AM

Tom Betz wrote:

Hell, China invented being on the take before Romulus and Remus sucked
their first wolf tit.



There was more than one? Those Italians never cease to amaze..Good thing it
was SPQR instead of SPCA...




mike

[email protected] January 14th 05 06:40 AM

tianli wrote:

Actually given the continual corruption in China, probably into some

corrupt
official's pocket. They're learning all the lessons of capitalism
currently, including how to be on the take.


And their use of torture and murder makes them unbeatable.


yep, torture and murder are fine tools, used by everyone who wants to make
money.

tianli January 14th 05 01:06 PM


"Joel Rubin" wrote
Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)

Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any
difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and
maybe even other broadcasts.


Any western program material allowed in China is very carefully scrutinized
for content.
It is heavily monitored and censored. Providers risk losing access if they
don't comply
the CPC rules.

This also extends into the book publishing business as at least one well
known TV program
provider is also in the book publishing business. The Communist Party in
China has so
much clout with these morally corrupt publishers that the CPC can snap their
fingers and
the publisher will refuse to publish a book IN THE U.S. of A if it happens
to offend the CPC.

These are FACTS!



tianli January 14th 05 01:08 PM


"Robert D" wrote
Oh my God Martha tote your portable, the Commies are taking over! You
know the first thing they do when they take over is ban Christmas then
they round up people like dxAce and cuhulin and send them to
Re-education camp where they turn them into empty-headed tards! Wait a
minute the Commies have taken over!!!



Oh my "God"(?) Robert, these things actually occur in China as we write.
Gasp!



tianli January 14th 05 01:12 PM

It is all a subtle form of propaganda.
Their programming is made to make you "feel good" about the country.
This removes your aversion to the fact that the Chinese Communist Party
is a murderous regime.

Go tote that CPC QSL boy! - LOL!

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
I check out this and other Asian re-broadcasts on a regular basis and

find
them to be very culturally oriented- rather than the political
propaganda
you might expect. Listen awhile and you may find it very entertaining-
in
other words; nothing like the Cuban news commentary!
Brian

Agreed, and the weekend English programming from Xian to Africa
(audible here in the US, probably off the back of the beam) is a good
bet for actually being able to easily QSL a Chinese outlet - and the
programming fun and decent.

Bruce Jensen




tianli January 14th 05 01:14 PM


"uncle arnie" wrote
Why does Radio Canada retransmit Radio China International? China seems
to jam most western stations, why should we help them?


Why do SW stations broadcast scary and silly religious nonsense: because
they sell the airtime on the open market. It's called capitalism. Same
reason that China is buying pieces of petroleum companies in North

America.
It's for sale and they buy it.

China is a big and growing trading nation, and everyone wants to be

friends
with those with money to spend. China is allegedly moving in a market
economy direction so friends is good and makes $.


Gee, I wonder when those "religious" programmers will see the light and
begin transmissions in China? - ROTFLMAO!



tianli January 14th 05 01:17 PM

Actually given the continual corruption in China, probably into some
corrupt
official's pocket. They're learning all the lessons of capitalism
currently, including how to be on the take.


And their use of torture and murder makes them unbeatable.



bpnjensen January 14th 05 03:28 PM

I assure you, I am under no misperception about the heinousness of
China's government oppression. Doesn't mean I cannot enjoy it's
programming and get a QSL, which I'll bet they'll gladly give out.

BJ


dxAce January 14th 05 03:42 PM



bpnjensen wrote:

I assure you, I am under no misperception about the heinousness of
China's government oppression. Doesn't mean I cannot enjoy it's
programming and get a QSL, which I'll bet they'll gladly give out.


Yep, sending a reception report and getting a QSL does not necessarily entail
tacit approval of a particular regime.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



running dogg January 14th 05 08:36 PM

tianli wrote:

It is all a subtle form of propaganda.
Their programming is made to make you "feel good" about the country.
This removes your aversion to the fact that the Chinese Communist Party
is a murderous regime.


I see China has finally learned the lessons of propaganda that the
Soviets never seemed to get. Instead of political harangues, they
broadcast "softer" programming (music, cultural, etc) meant to provide a
positive view of their country to the outside world. The Soviet stuff
unintentionally provided a negative view of their bloc-all you heard
were political rants against "evil imperialist American dogs". Radio
Peking used to broadcast the SAME phrase over and over for hours on end,
as if the point wasn't made after the first 15 minutes. The North
Koreans are still clueless on this front-all you hear on Voice of Korea
is odes to Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il.


Go tote that CPC QSL boy! - LOL!

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
I check out this and other Asian re-broadcasts on a regular basis and

find
them to be very culturally oriented- rather than the political
propaganda
you might expect. Listen awhile and you may find it very entertaining-
in
other words; nothing like the Cuban news commentary!
Brian

Agreed, and the weekend English programming from Xian to Africa
(audible here in the US, probably off the back of the beam) is a good
bet for actually being able to easily QSL a Chinese outlet - and the
programming fun and decent.

Bruce Jensen






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

tianli January 14th 05 11:34 PM

Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)

These are FACTS!


Why does CCP still fret over the news?
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/...20050110a2.htm

Afraid of the 'JiuPing' (Nine Commentaries) phenomenon, the Chinese
Communist Party attempted to control the media and interfere with the
freedom of press in the United States.
http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-1-9/25609.html

China Seizure Halts U.S. Delivery of President's Book "The Clinton Years"
http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2000/8/28_6.html

Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and the Beijing Connection
http://www.sprint.net.au/~rwb/murdoch1.htm

So, why DOES Radio Canada retransmit Radio Communist?




starman January 16th 05 08:24 AM

I assure you, I am under no misperception about the heinousness of
China's government oppression. Doesn't mean I cannot enjoy it's
programming and get a QSL, which I'll bet they'll gladly give out.


Yep, sending a reception report and getting a QSL does not necessarily entail
tacit approval of a particular regime.


The US government apparently didn't agree. They used to intercept and
open mail, sent by SWL's to the radio stations of communist countries,
on a regular basis. It was common practice in the 60's and 70's. In most
cases the letters were eventually delivered to their destination, albeit
in a somewhat used condition. One would hope this has stopped but I bet
any letter sent from the US to the Voice of Korea or Radio Havana Cuba
may not only fail to be delivered but is opened and scrutinized.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

dxAce January 16th 05 12:02 PM



starman wrote:

I assure you, I am under no misperception about the heinousness of
China's government oppression. Doesn't mean I cannot enjoy it's
programming and get a QSL, which I'll bet they'll gladly give out.


Yep, sending a reception report and getting a QSL does not necessarily entail
tacit approval of a particular regime.


The US government apparently didn't agree. They used to intercept and
open mail, sent by SWL's to the radio stations of communist countries,
on a regular basis. It was common practice in the 60's and 70's. In most
cases the letters were eventually delivered to their destination, albeit
in a somewhat used condition. One would hope this has stopped but I bet
any letter sent from the US to the Voice of Korea or Radio Havana Cuba
may not only fail to be delivered but is opened and scrutinized.


That may indeed be true, however you are confusing the individual listener with the
'government'.

Once again, sending a reception report and getting a QSL does not necessarily entail
tacit approval of a particular regime.

With regards to N. Korea, the problem always seemed to be mail intercepted in Japan,
not necessarily in the US. I'd never had a problem with mail either to or from Cuba.

dxAce
Michigan
USA




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com