![]() |
Is this a good antenna?
Kind of a mixed bag from the reviews I've read. May be a passable to
good performer on higher bands, but poor on the lower ones and I remember reading some complains about it being noisy. Best to do a google groups search and read away for a few hours. I've seen several new antennas over the years, and while they will catch signals, they don't turn out to be the one antenna-that-works-all-bands equally well as is usually claimed by the maker. atomicthumbs wrote: http://www.gapantenna.com/superc.htm |
In article . com,
"atomicthumbs" wrote: http://www.gapantenna.com/superc.htm No. It would be a poor receiving antenna. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
drs maxwell, rao, and yagi just turned over in their grave...it would
have been a riot if he published the radiation pattern....this is even better than the "magic rabbit ears" adds.. On 27 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0800, "atomicthumbs" wrote: http://www.gapantenna.com/superc.htm |
wrote in message ... drs maxwell, rao, and yagi just turned over in their grave...it would have been a riot if he published the radiation pattern....this is even better than the "magic rabbit ears" adds.. On 27 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0800, "atomicthumbs" wrote: http://www.gapantenna.com/superc.htm I don't know... maybe if you add one of those "internal cellular telephone booster antennas" that they were advertising years ago to your radio, it might work better! -- Tom Sevart N2UHC Frontenac, KS http://www.geocities.com/n2uhc |
_
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com