Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 9th 05, 05:13 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yosemite Sam

I was looking at the Spooks Digest list this morning and I noted a report that
Yosemite Sam was operating again on 6500 so I decided to check that and the
other frequencies that YS operated on at the same time 6500 was last used and
found YS on 10500 at 1707.

I didn't hear YS on 6500, but that may be a propagation issue.

When YS last used 10500 and 6500 he was also using 3700, so that may bear
watching later today when propagation will be favourable.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 9th 05, 05:21 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



dxAce wrote:

I was looking at the Spooks Digest list this morning and I noted a report that
Yosemite Sam was operating again on 6500 so I decided to check that and the
other frequencies that YS operated on at the same time 6500 was last used and
found YS on 10500 at 1707.

I didn't hear YS on 6500, but that may be a propagation issue.


I just checked 6500 again and can hear YS with a very weak signal at 1720.



When YS last used 10500 and 6500 he was also using 3700, so that may bear
watching later today when propagation will be favourable.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


  #3   Report Post  
Old February 9th 05, 05:41 PM
Tom Sevart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sam coming in good here in KS on both 6500 and 10500 DSB. Nothing heard on
3700 or 4300, but will check back later tonight.


--
Tom Sevart N2UHC
Frontenac, KS
http://www.geocities.com/n2uhc


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 9th 05, 05:45 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom Sevart wrote:

Sam coming in good here in KS on both 6500 and 10500 DSB. Nothing heard on
3700 or 4300, but will check back later tonight.


Thanks for the reminder about 4300.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #5   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 01:41 PM
David Stinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default



dxAce wrote:

A few weeks ago it was thought to be coming from northern New Mexico, based upon
propagation.


Uncle Sam has multiple hi-power transmitter sites
which can all be controlled from a central site
and used in any combination
(I was a SHARES op and worked them on many occasions).
Each could be controlled independantly for power,
mode, directivity etc.
Given the large spread of frequencies used,
the power levels and, most telling,
the obvious switching between multiple transmitter
locations when I last heard them on 10 MC,
I still believe YS was an excercise in DFing,
probably run for the benefit of multiple agencies.
You've all heard pirates. Compare their flea-fart
transmissions to what you've heard from Sam.
Just one guy's opinion, but an informed one.
Dave S.


  #6   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 02:02 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David Stinson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

A few weeks ago it was thought to be coming from northern New Mexico, based upon
propagation.


Uncle Sam has multiple hi-power transmitter sites
which can all be controlled from a central site
and used in any combination
(I was a SHARES op and worked them on many occasions).
Each could be controlled independantly for power,
mode, directivity etc.
Given the large spread of frequencies used,
the power levels and, most telling,
the obvious switching between multiple transmitter
locations when I last heard them on 10 MC,
I still believe YS was an excercise in DFing,
probably run for the benefit of multiple agencies.
You've all heard pirates. Compare their flea-fart
transmissions to what you've heard from Sam.
Just one guy's opinion, but an informed one.


I never heard (or read) anything about multiple locations. As best as I and others
could determine is that the signal was (is) coming from northern New Mexico. And
narrowed down specifically to the Albuquerque area.

I've seen nothing much regarding this return to the original frequencies versus the
operation under WWV, but monitoring observations here would indicate that it's
operating from the same general area based upon propagation.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #7   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 02:21 PM
David Stinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default



dxAce wrote:
I've seen nothing much regarding this return to the original frequencies versus the
operation under WWV, but monitoring observations here would indicate that it's
operating from the same general area based upon propagation.


I didn't hear him on the original freqs; came to the YS game too late.
But the transmissions under WWV were characteristic
of Unc's multiple site transmissions. Having worked them over
the years, that was the "tell" for me. Perhaps the main
effort was being concentrated around Albuquerque;
one of the big sites is located near there.

Dave S.
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 02:28 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David Stinson wrote:

dxAce wrote:
I've seen nothing much regarding this return to the original frequencies versus the
operation under WWV, but monitoring observations here would indicate that it's
operating from the same general area based upon propagation.


I didn't hear him on the original freqs; came to the YS game too late.
But the transmissions under WWV were characteristic
of Unc's multiple site transmissions. Having worked them over
the years, that was the "tell" for me. Perhaps the main
effort was being concentrated around Albuquerque;
one of the big sites is located near there.


Based upon propagation and the observations of others it would seem as though there is
only one site, even given the operation on the WWV/WWVH frequencies.

Nothing noted here, or observed elsewhere to the best of my knowledge would indicate any
shift from one site to another on any given frequency or multiple frequencies.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



  #9   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 02:30 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David Stinson wrote:

dxAce wrote:
I've seen nothing much regarding this return to the original frequencies versus the
operation under WWV, but monitoring observations here would indicate that it's
operating from the same general area based upon propagation.


I didn't hear him on the original freqs;


The 'original' frequencies are in use now. They are 10500, 6500, 4300 and 3700.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #10   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 04:06 PM
David Stinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default



dxAce wrote:


Based upon propagation and the observations of others it would seem as though there is
only one site, even given the operation on the WWV/WWVH frequencies.


Each to his own opinion, I guess.
At least you didn't call me " 'tard boy" ;-).
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yosemite Sam dxAce Shortwave 29 January 17th 05 10:44 AM
Yosemite Sam's buzzing back? [email protected] Shortwave 0 December 31st 04 01:50 AM
Yosemite Sam Is Dead [email protected] Shortwave 0 December 24th 04 04:28 PM
Yosemite Sam Frequencies dxAce Shortwave 16 December 24th 04 09:45 AM
Anybody Else Hear Yosemite Sam on 3700 kHz DSB? [email protected] Policy 1 December 24th 04 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017