Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephan Grossklass wrote in
: Conan Ford schrieb: I have a Sangean ATS-803a and a Degen DE-1103. On both, I get images in the LW band of MW band stations. They are at the frequency of the medium wave station divided by 10, i.e. 1010 khz shows up at 101. Why do they show up at 1/10 the frequency? These are both dual conversion radios. That is not (1010/10) kHz = 101 kHz, but (1010 - 2x 455) kHz = 100 kHz. Non-ideal 2nd IF image rejection isn't uncommon particularly among smaller and/or less expensive rigs with high 1st IFs (Sony's ICF-SW7600[|G|GR] models are also affected). The crystal filters used there should be selective enough by themselves, but apparently leakage around the filter (better receivers don't have rather large ground planes around the 1st IF filters for no reason - RF tends to go its own ways as you get to higher freqs) and possibly also mixer related issues limit ultimate rejection. Single conversion sets with frontend tracking (varicap tuned in PLL based sets, with conventional tuning capacitors otherwise) may actually be in advantage on low frequency ranges like MW and LW, that's why high performance AMBCB sets have never needed to use dual conversion. (In fact, one more mixer may also mean more noise.) PLL based dual conversion designs are usually wideband receivers without a lot of front-end filtering. (Bandspread dual conversion analogs are a different matter, these can easily use band filters for SW. That's why they get along with much lower 1st IFs.) I guess including additional front-end tracking on LW/MW only would cost even more than getting 1st IF filtering right. Better-quality portables use switched front-end filters (the Satellit 700 even had a tracking function, not always that well aligned BTW), but these require care in application as well, given switching diodes used for selecting a filter electronically can introduce intermod themselves! (One of the Kenwood R-2000 mods comprised the replacement of the stock switching diodes with, I think, PIN types. Actually a number of older rigs will benefit from such a measure, including the JRC NRD-515.) Stephan Interesting, I'd seen a lot of references to LW station really being MW stations on this group, but not a detailed explanation like this. I had always thought that dual conversion took care of this. I did always wonder on my (even lower end) dual conversion DE-1102 why the MW broadcast station bled into SW bands. For the DE-1103, I know there is some filtering switching in for SW frequencies, in particular a lowpass filter for 1700 khz or so, and a highpass filter for 30000 khz. This gets rid of the MW band bleeding into the SW bands, which you see on other radios like the DE-1102 (dual conversion) and the PL-550 (single conversion). I suppose the ATS-803A must have some similar scheme as well. I imagine that there wasn't as much care or concern about the LW band when these radios were designed. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thermal and EM images of antenna ? | Antenna | |||
910 KHz images | Shortwave | |||
ON4SKY needs images of your lightning protection | Antenna | |||
ON4SKY needs images of your lightning protection | Equipment | |||
Latest News - Morse Code Test May Not "Die" at ITU Conference. | Policy |