PLEASE don't start new threads when when replying!
 

Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

Thanks all.
--
~/.signature

Heyyyyy Asshole,you ever hear the cry of the DOO DOO BIRD before?
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh ****ttttttt!!!!!!!!
cuhulin

Al Arduengo wrote:
Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

Thanks all.
--
~/.signature

So, how about those Mets?

when when what? Go play with yourself!
cuhulin

GO Saints! GO IRA!
cuhulin

How bout that,Sports Fans!?
cuhulin

(OT) can also mean (OT On Topic) I posted something about shortwave
radios here just a short while ago.I think I hear your momy calling you
so your diaper needs changing.
cuhulin

wrote in message
...
GO Saints! GO IRA!

Rooting for the terrorists, are we?

"Al Arduengo" wrote in message
...


Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

You must be new to Usenet. When a thread goes off on such a tangent that it
has nothing to do with the original post, the polite thing to do is rename
the thread...preferably with a Was: in front of the old name. That way
people who want to follow the original, on-topic discussion can do so
without wading through all of the other, unrelated crap. Let's say we're
discussing images, and cuhulin chimes in that his dog Blueberry
www.cattledog.com just farted in his open mouth. That leads off to a thread
of discussion that has nothing to do with images, like why is his open mouth
so close to Blueberry's ass in the first place? Anyone who wants to follow
the images conversation has to wade through the farting cattledog replies.
Not good.

So then someone renames the thread "Cuhulin sucks dog farts Was: images".

That's good. See, when the replies aren't to the original thread, they don't
belong in the thread they originated in. ;)

I am NOT a terrorist.I root for the Republic of Ireland and Scotland.If
you don't like my opinion,YOU go to HELL!!! YOU canadian TURD!!!!!! GO
IRA,GO!
cuhulin

Hear ' bout them 200 WMD sitese in Iraq ?

George Bush is gonna invade ..

Yessiree Bob ! !

wrote:

Hear ' bout them 200 WMD sitese in Iraq ?

George Bush is gonna invade ..

Yessiree Bob ! !

When did you get out of therapy? I'm guessing you went there after Kerry lost.

You did disappear for quite a while. Was that the reason?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

- Was in Iraq, Lookin fer them WMD's..

On 2005-02-19, Honus wrote:

"Al Arduengo" wrote in message
...


Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

You must be new to Usenet. When a thread goes off on such a tangent that it
has nothing to do with the original post, the polite thing to do is rename
the thread...preferably with a Was: in front of the old name. That way
people who want to follow the original, on-topic discussion can do so
without wading through all of the other, unrelated crap. Let's say we're
discussing images, and cuhulin chimes in that his dog Blueberry
www.cattledog.com just farted in his open mouth. That leads off to a thread
of discussion that has nothing to do with images, like why is his open mouth
so close to Blueberry's ass in the first place? Anyone who wants to follow
the images conversation has to wade through the farting cattledog replies.
Not good.

So then someone renames the thread "Cuhulin sucks dog farts Was: images".

That's good. See, when the replies aren't to the original thread, they don't
belong in the thread they originated in. ;)



Actually I am not new to usenet. And I made the invalid assumption that those
reading would know to only create a new thread when the actual subject of the
discussion changed. Most of the violaters here start a new thread everytime
they reply to a post. *That* is what I am complaining about.

Thanks.

--
~/.signature

Now I Know! you are a mental case!
cuhulin

wrote:

- Was in Iraq, Lookin fer them WMD's..

Uh huh... so when did you get out of therapy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

wrote:

- Was in Iraq, Lookin fer them WMD's..

Uh huh... so when did you get out of therapy?

It looks to me that the therapy didn't take.

Try electro-shock next time.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Al Arduengo" wrote in message
...
Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

Thanks all.
--
~/.signature


Thank you Al,
I'm so glad you took the time to share this with me.

TIA, Cya

Burr

I guess I am one of the bad guys, I'm sorry that I started a new tread but I
"just can't help myself".

Any help you could give me as to where I may be able to get help would
be appreciated

Sincerely

Burr



"Al Arduengo" wrote in message
...
On 2005-02-19, Honus wrote:

"Al Arduengo" wrote in message
...


Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

You must be new to Usenet. When a thread goes off on such a tangent that
it
has nothing to do with the original post, the polite thing to do is
rename
the thread...preferably with a Was: in front of the old name. That way
people who want to follow the original, on-topic discussion can do so
without wading through all of the other, unrelated crap. Let's say we're
discussing images, and cuhulin chimes in that his dog Blueberry
www.cattledog.com just farted in his open mouth. That leads off to a
thread
of discussion that has nothing to do with images, like why is his open
mouth
so close to Blueberry's ass in the first place? Anyone who wants to
follow
the images conversation has to wade through the farting cattledog
replies.
Not good.

So then someone renames the thread "Cuhulin sucks dog farts Was: images".

That's good. See, when the replies aren't to the original thread, they
don't
belong in the thread they originated in. ;)



Actually I am not new to usenet. And I made the invalid assumption that
those
reading would know to only create a new thread when the actual subject of
the
discussion changed. Most of the violaters here start a new thread
everytime
they reply to a post. *That* is what I am complaining about.

Thanks.

--
~/.signature

wrote in message
...

I am NOT a terrorist.

No one said that you were. Well, Bush might have implied it at some point.

I root for the Republic of Ireland and Scotland.

My wife's a Scot. BFD.

If you don't like my opinion,YOU go to HELL!!!

There is no Hell, unless it's living next door to you. And if disliking
someone's opinions gets them on the fast track to Hell, well then...we're
going to be traveling companions, you and I.

YOU canadian TURD!!!!!!

I'm not a Canadian, dip****. And I'm more of an American than you could ever
hope to be. :)


GO IRA,GO!

The IRA are terrorists. They've killed hundreds of innocent civilians,
including children. They've been known to associate and align themselves
with communists, South American drug dealers and Islamic terrorists. And
again we see you rooting for them. Why don't you do a little research on the
net about these people, and then get back to us. I'd sure like to hear if
about it if your position changes.

Oh, and you never got back to me about whether or not the word homophobe
applies to you. Did you look it up? Did you understand the definition? Do I
get that apology from you?

wrote in message
...
Now I Know! you are a mental case!

At least I know enough to keep my face away from my dog's ass. Or were you
simply trying to find a way of improving the smell of your breath?

Hey Honus,
Your talking to a Marine, some ones going to pinch your head off and put
it where the sun don't shine.

Don't forget.

Burr

PS: Use your real name, if your a man.



"Honus" wrote in message
news:81PRd.32748$wc.11530@trnddc07...

wrote in message
...

I am NOT a terrorist.

No one said that you were. Well, Bush might have implied it at some point.

I root for the Republic of Ireland and Scotland.

My wife's a Scot. BFD.

If you don't like my opinion,YOU go to HELL!!!

There is no Hell, unless it's living next door to you. And if disliking
someone's opinions gets them on the fast track to Hell, well then...we're
going to be traveling companions, you and I.

YOU canadian TURD!!!!!!

I'm not a Canadian, dip****. And I'm more of an American than you could
ever
hope to be. :)


GO IRA,GO!

The IRA are terrorists. They've killed hundreds of innocent civilians,
including children. They've been known to associate and align themselves
with communists, South American drug dealers and Islamic terrorists. And
again we see you rooting for them. Why don't you do a little research on
the
net about these people, and then get back to us. I'd sure like to hear if
about it if your position changes.

Oh, and you never got back to me about whether or not the word homophobe
applies to you. Did you look it up? Did you understand the definition? Do
I
get that apology from you?

"Burr" wrote in message
news:GKPRd.12841$uc.12526@trnddc09...
Hey Honus,
Your talking to a Marine, some ones going to pinch your head off and
put
it where the sun don't shine.

I was speaking to Al Arduengo on a finer point of Usenet etiquette. I also
brought up cuhulin. I'm not familiar with Arduengo's military background, if
he has one. I'm familiar with cuhulin's, though...and he was in the Army
IIRC. So I can only assume that you think I'm addressing you, although I'm
not sure why. I haven't addressed you in this thread. As a matter of fact, I
may have never addressed you at all, ever. So, if you're the Marine in
question, let me assure you that I wasn't speaking to you. Besides that,
nothing in my post could be considered critical of you in any way, since you
never came up. How you got yourself involved in this I don't know. Am I'm
mistaken about cuhulin, and he was in fact in the Corps? As for someone
pinching my head off, keep your empty threats to yourself. The last thing
that impresses me is some one making threats from behind his keyboard. Does
that apply to you? I don't know...that's for you to decide.

Don't forget.

Don't forget what?

Burr

PS: Use your real name, if your a man.

Come threaten me to my face, if you're a man.

See how easy that was? Hollow threats impress no one. I could post using
the name Burr Patterson and you'd have no way of knowing if it was true or
not. Anyone on the net can call themselves whatever they want to. Does it
bother you that I don't use my real name? Great! That's one of the reasons
that I don't do it. Not only that, Honus is a real surname. If I hadn't told
you that Honus wasn't my name, you'd just look like an ass for accusing me
of using a nym because I could easily claim (and "prove") that it -was- my
real name. ( www.whitepages.com ) It's all kind of funny, coming from a guy
named Burr. Until someone that I trust about vouches for you, or until I
investigate it for myself (which I have no plans on doing) I've no assurance
that that's your real name. I'm sure it is, but it doesn't matter whether it
is or not. I'm not going to come looking for you. I'm not going to call you
at home. I'm not going to send you a mail bomb. Were you planning on coming
looking for me? I'm sure that's not the case. So get over it. It
means -nothing-, and I'm not about to start using my real name because you
want me to, or because you think less of me since I don't.

Oh, wait...was that use your real name directed at cuhulin, and not me? Or
one of the other guys here that don't use their real names? No...I didn't
think so.

Al Arduengo wrote:

Replys should stay within the thread from which they originated.

Thanks all.

We've got a better chance of the proverbial pigs flying on this group.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

AA,