Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MC" wrote in
t: I've just replaced my old cable with some nice shiney new 50ohm coax attached directly to my 100+ feet of longwire. As I still want to suck that little extra out of my antenna, I want to add a balun but I am confused with this transformer ratio stuff. I realise that a long wire has quite a high impedance. However, should I go for a 1:4 or a 1:10 ratio balun. If I went for the 1:10 would it be overkill and will it make any difference over the RF if I only had a 1:4. I ask because I can get a 1:10 a lot cheaper than a 1:4. Confused? I am ![]() MC 1:9 is ideal for a longwire (ideal impedence is 450 ohms, matched to 50 ohm coax, so 50:450 = 1:9), so go for the 1:10. The 1:4 is for something with lower impedence than a longwire. Not all baluns are created equal, however. What frequencies are they rated for? This will depend on the turns count of the windings and also on the ferrite material. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more | Shortwave | |||
Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole | Antenna | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna |