Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9,
Conan Ford wrote: "MC" wrote in t: I've just replaced my old cable with some nice shiney new 50ohm coax attached directly to my 100+ feet of longwire. As I still want to suck that little extra out of my antenna, I want to add a balun but I am confused with this transformer ratio stuff. I realise that a long wire has quite a high impedance. However, should I go for a 1:4 or a 1:10 ratio balun. If I went for the 1:10 would it be overkill and will it make any difference over the RF if I only had a 1:4. I ask because I can get a 1:10 a lot cheaper than a 1:4. Confused? I am ![]() MC 1:9 is ideal for a longwire (ideal impedence is 450 ohms, matched to 50 ohm coax, so 50:450 = 1:9), so go for the 1:10. The 1:4 is for something with lower impedence than a longwire. Not all baluns are created equal, however. What frequencies are they rated for? This will depend on the turns count of the windings and also on the ferrite material. The impedance of the wire depends on the height above ground. The 1:9 is most likely best. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more | Shortwave | |||
Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole | Antenna | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Shortwave | |||
Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna |