Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even selctivity will not help all that much in the case of most
noise. Which by nature is broadbanded. When fightening someforms of digitalnoise, a real narrow IF fitler can sometimes help. But unless you are trying to dig CW out frm the man made noise, super narrow filters are really much use. Much better to work to reduce you local noise. A low noise antenna can really help. From what I have read the Wellbrook loop,is great at reducing "point source" noises. I have played with home made shielded/balanced loops, but the results weren't worth the added trouble. I am currently playing with a sycnhronous noise blanker that "slices"/mutes the antenna output for an adjustable number of mSec with a 60Hz line locked "switch". It almost works. Some of the Lowfers swear by this. The "swicth" has to go ahaead of the radio's front end. I am strting to think that my 9:1 matching transformer is "ringing". Terry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Icom 746pro Testimonial | Shortwave | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |