RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   quake / Tsunami / Quayle - 3210 KHz (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/66287-quake-tsunami-quayle-3210-khz.html)

Al Patrick March 8th 05 12:17 AM

quake / Tsunami / Quayle - 3210 KHz
 
I missed part of it but it sounds like the gov't has issued warnings for
quake / tsunami along the OR & WA coasts.

Tune Steve Quayle, the Q-Files , http://www.stevequayle.com , 3210

clvrmnky March 9th 05 05:54 PM

On 07/03/2005 7:17 PM, Al Patrick wrote:
I missed part of it but it sounds like the gov't has issued warnings for
quake / tsunami along the OR & WA coasts.

Tune Steve Quayle, the Q-Files , http://www.stevequayle.com , 3210


Given the recent activity of Mt. St. Helens, I'd say earthquakes are a
definitely possibility in that part of the world. It's a geologically
active part of the world.

A tsunami, though obviously not unknown on the left coast, is more
unlikely simply because there are more specific circumstances necessary
for that to happen.

Al Patrick March 9th 05 06:52 PM

clvrmnky wrote:
On 07/03/2005 7:17 PM, Al Patrick wrote:

I missed part of it but it sounds like the gov't has issued warnings
for quake / tsunami along the OR & WA coasts.

Tune Steve Quayle, the Q-Files , http://www.stevequayle.com , 3210



Given the recent activity of Mt. St. Helens, I'd say earthquakes are a
definitely possibility in that part of the world. It's a geologically
active part of the world.

A tsunami, though obviously not unknown on the left coast, is more
unlikely simply because there are more specific circumstances necessary
for that to happen.


At the time I posted that Stan Deyo was showing high water temperature
contrasts (from government sources) very close together just off the
Washington & Oregon coasts. This was BEFORE Mt. St. Helens blew this
last time, so there could well be a connection. The mount had been
building for some time recently but had not blown, to my knowledge.

The tsunami, it was presumed would/could be a result of a deep under
water quake. I heard some discussion on which caused the greater
tsunami, a deep or shallow quake. I think it was the one in deep water,
but the magnitude of the quake would have a lot to do with it.

Haven't checked Steve's web site in a couple of days, but he keeps it
updated pretty well on quakes around the globe - as well as active
volcanoes.

i.e. the temp charts. I think this only works over water as the source
of the info is limited to water temperatures from naval sources. His
method of prediction is invalid on land.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com