Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone know the difference between the 2515 and the 2515A?
I wonder who built this rcvr? Trio maybe? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that this was a Trio unit. It used one of the Toko ceramic
filter/I.F. transformer combinations in the 455kHz I.F. strip. It wasn't a bad unit. Pete "Michael" wrote in message ... Anyone know the difference between the 2515 and the 2515A? I wonder who built this rcvr? Trio maybe? Thanks |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael wrote: Anyone know the difference between the 2515 and the 2515A? I wonder who built this rcvr? Trio maybe? Thanks The main difference is in the IF strip. The 2515 uses 4 of the filters in the IF while the "A" only uses 2. I believe one stage IF amp stage was dropped in the "A" model as well. Another minor difference is in the RF amp. In the 2515 the bias on gate 2 of the dual gate MOSFET is fixed with a voltage divider, while in the "A" a variable resistor is added into the network, so as to be able to vary the bias over a small range. I remember using the 2515 as a SWL rx back in the late 60's and finding the 4 IF filters to be too much selectivity for AM broadcasts, and not quite enough for CW/SSB. The "A" model having fewer cans fared better with AM. Those cans were a mystery as well. I don't think they were Toko products but I don't know for sure. I opened one up once and found what appears to be a ceramic filter disk and an unusual arrangement of coils. These radio were sold by Allied Radio. I have not been able to determine who actually made them. I once corresponded with a Trio employee who worked there about the time these units were being sold, and he swore they were not one of theirs. Bob |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those were Toko units................some of the CB radios such as the
Johnson 123 used them. Actually, I've even got a couple of them on hand for upgrades with radios that use the Toko 10mm transformers. Pete "Bob Liesenfeld" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: Anyone know the difference between the 2515 and the 2515A? I wonder who built this rcvr? Trio maybe? Thanks The main difference is in the IF strip. The 2515 uses 4 of the filters in the IF while the "A" only uses 2. I believe one stage IF amp stage was dropped in the "A" model as well. Another minor difference is in the RF amp. In the 2515 the bias on gate 2 of the dual gate MOSFET is fixed with a voltage divider, while in the "A" a variable resistor is added into the network, so as to be able to vary the bias over a small range. I remember using the 2515 as a SWL rx back in the late 60's and finding the 4 IF filters to be too much selectivity for AM broadcasts, and not quite enough for CW/SSB. The "A" model having fewer cans fared better with AM. Those cans were a mystery as well. I don't think they were Toko products but I don't know for sure. I opened one up once and found what appears to be a ceramic filter disk and an unusual arrangement of coils. These radio were sold by Allied Radio. I have not been able to determine who actually made them. I once corresponded with a Trio employee who worked there about the time these units were being sold, and he swore they were not one of theirs. Bob |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was a Japanese company that made a smaller version
of the Collins Mechanical fitler and I htink it looked like your discription. Poptronics ran an article int he mid 1960s about how to add one to your existing SW receiver. I Terry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those filters were pretty awful................I don't remember the name of
the company name, but it started with the letter K. They were used in the NRD-515 and in the Yaesu FRDX-400. They were filled with some sort of foam substance that turns to a sticky jelly after many years, causing the insertion loss of the filter to degrade. Peter Bertini had an article in Popular Communications a few years ago on how to repair them. I did just that for a friend's FRDX-400. You have to dismantle the filter and clean out all of the goo with alcohol..........I used a product called Flux-Off. Afterwards, you have to replace the foam damping material. I used air conditioner foam strip. Another thing about those filters....there is no other mechanical support for the filter elements themselves. When you remove the goo, you have the filter structure hanging by a few strands of Litz wire. For years, I was looking for an NRD-515 until I discovered those filter problems. I have never seen a Collins mechanical filter fail in that manner, and I have had quite a few of those filters over the years. If any of you ever have the problem with your JRC radios that use that filter, I can give you advice on how to repair them.....................if you don't feel comfortable repairing them yourself, I can repair them for you. I did have one of those 2515 in for repair a couple of years ago, and the unit that I repaired did not have any mechanical filters even though the advertising hype stated that it did. It was definitely one of those slightly oblong I.F. transformers that had the ceramic filter inside the same structure. For a cheap receiver, they weren't bad. Anybody remember the transceiver that matched this unit in style? A friend once told me that it was a Kenwood TS-510 with Allied's label. Pete wrote in message ups.com... There was a Japanese company that made a smaller version of the Collins Mechanical fitler and I htink it looked like your discription. Poptronics ran an article int he mid 1960s about how to add one to your existing SW receiver. I Terry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is no excuse for a penny pinching move like that in an expensive
radio. My opinion of Japan Radio just went down a couple of notches. Pete KE9OA wrote: Those filters were pretty awful................I don't remember the name of the company name, but it started with the letter K. They were used in the NRD-515 and in the Yaesu FRDX-400. They were filled with some sort of foam substance that turns to a sticky jelly after many years, causing the insertion loss of the filter to degrade. Peter Bertini had an article in Popular Communications a few years ago on how to repair them. I did just that for a friend's FRDX-400. You have to dismantle the filter and clean out all of the goo with alcohol..........I used a product called Flux-Off. Afterwards, you have to replace the foam damping material. I used air conditioner foam strip. Another thing about those filters....there is no other mechanical support for the filter elements themselves. When you remove the goo, you have the filter structure hanging by a few strands of Litz wire. For years, I was looking for an NRD-515 until I discovered those filter problems. I have never seen a Collins mechanical filter fail in that manner, and I have had quite a few of those filters over the years. If any of you ever have the problem with your JRC radios that use that filter, I can give you advice on how to repair them.....................if you don't feel comfortable repairing them yourself, I can repair them for you. I did have one of those 2515 in for repair a couple of years ago, and the unit that I repaired did not have any mechanical filters even though the advertising hype stated that it did. It was definitely one of those slightly oblong I.F. transformers that had the ceramic filter inside the same structure. For a cheap receiver, they weren't bad. Anybody remember the transceiver that matched this unit in style? A friend once told me that it was a Kenwood TS-510 with Allied's label. Pete wrote in message ups.com... There was a Japanese company that made a smaller version of the Collins Mechanical fitler and I htink it looked like your discription. Poptronics ran an article int he mid 1960s about how to add one to your existing SW receiver. I Terry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The radio itself was pretty good.................I knew a fellow back in
Iowa that had Collins filters installed and he was pretty happy with the result. I was going to match the impedance of the new filters to the '515 but I lost track of him. It is still my favorite of the JRCs. wrote in message ups.com... There is no excuse for a penny pinching move like that in an expensive radio. My opinion of Japan Radio just went down a couple of notches. Pete KE9OA wrote: Those filters were pretty awful................I don't remember the name of the company name, but it started with the letter K. They were used in the NRD-515 and in the Yaesu FRDX-400. They were filled with some sort of foam substance that turns to a sticky jelly after many years, causing the insertion loss of the filter to degrade. Peter Bertini had an article in Popular Communications a few years ago on how to repair them. I did just that for a friend's FRDX-400. You have to dismantle the filter and clean out all of the goo with alcohol..........I used a product called Flux-Off. Afterwards, you have to replace the foam damping material. I used air conditioner foam strip. Another thing about those filters....there is no other mechanical support for the filter elements themselves. When you remove the goo, you have the filter structure hanging by a few strands of Litz wire. For years, I was looking for an NRD-515 until I discovered those filter problems. I have never seen a Collins mechanical filter fail in that manner, and I have had quite a few of those filters over the years. If any of you ever have the problem with your JRC radios that use that filter, I can give you advice on how to repair them.....................if you don't feel comfortable repairing them yourself, I can repair them for you. I did have one of those 2515 in for repair a couple of years ago, and the unit that I repaired did not have any mechanical filters even though the advertising hype stated that it did. It was definitely one of those slightly oblong I.F. transformers that had the ceramic filter inside the same structure. For a cheap receiver, they weren't bad. Anybody remember the transceiver that matched this unit in style? A friend once told me that it was a Kenwood TS-510 with Allied's label. Pete wrote in message ups.com... There was a Japanese company that made a smaller version of the Collins Mechanical fitler and I htink it looked like your discription. Poptronics ran an article int he mid 1960s about how to add one to your existing SW receiver. I Terry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete KE9OA" ) writes: Those filters were pretty awful................I don't remember the name of the company name, but it started with the letter K. They were used in the NRD-515 and in the Yaesu FRDX-400. They were filled with some sort of foam substance that turns to a sticky jelly after many years, causing the insertion loss of the filter to degrade. Peter Bertini had an article in Popular Communications a few years ago on how to repair them. I did just that for a friend's FRDX-400. You have to dismantle the filter and clean out all of the goo with alcohol..........I used a product called Flux-Off. Of course, one pays quite a bit for Collins mechanical filters, and that's always been the case. Those Japanese mechanical filters were significantly cheaper, at least back then. Reading the old magazines, I've sometimes wondered if at least some times people were calling ceramic filters the wrong thing. Your description of the insides reminds me that some guy wrote about a homebrew receiver in the early sixties, I think it was in CQ, and he made his own mechanical filter. No, I don't have it handy and can't specify the issue, but every so often I come across the article, and wonder how practical it was to do. It seems like we'd have read more about doing it if it was something easily doable. Michael |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
updated Allied SX-190 AX-190 SW receiver info | Equipment | |||
updated Allied SX-190 AX-190 SW receiver info | Equipment | |||
updated Allied SX-190 AX-190 SW receiver info | Boatanchors | |||
Allied SX-190 / AX-190 receiver info | Boatanchors | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |