-=jd=- wrote:

On Tue 22 Mar 2005 08:35:38p, "David Eduardo" wrote
in message :


"David" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:18 -0500, "Michael Lawson"
wrote:



Still costs too much, because the "as little as $150"
is not what they will pay; in the third world, it
tends to cost higher. Many people there already
own shortwaves and they don't have our need to
have the latest gadget.

If it's the 21st Century, how come we're still listening
to AM radio and watching analog televisions??

--Mike L.

$68 wholesale. There is a foundation.

AM radio and analog TV aren't relevant.

This would be why 6 of the top 10 billing stations in the USA are AM?
17 of the top 40 stations? Including the second and 4th highest billers
in the US?



One of these days, Rickets will realize that it is *his* opinions and view-
points that are not relevant. The subsequent implosion of his ego should
register on every functioning seismograph on the face of the Earth.

It should be good for a chuckle or two...

Can this sort of thing be predicted, so that I'm not in LA when it
happens? I mean, the implosion of an ego that size could wipe out dozens
of square miles. It could create a massive tsunami, create new earth
formations. Now imagine what would happen if EVERY inflated ego in LA
imploded. Not a pretty picture.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----