Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Pete,
If you have to choose only one antenna impedance input, the high one would probably be more useful, particularly for users of real long wires like beverage antennas. However those like myself with an inverted-L which uses a matching transformer and coax lead would appreciate the 50-ohm input. Is there a reason why you are considering only a BNC connector for the low impedance input? How about a PC board mounted female F-connector which can be adapted by the users to their antenna lead wire. Any idea on when the MW receiver may hit the market? Pete KE9OA wrote: I am finishing up the MW receiver..............anyway, I have a high impedance antenna input in addition to the 50 ohm input. With this type of receiver is the high impedance input enough, or would interested parties rather have both inputs. The reason I am asking this is because my employer would like to have all jacks mounted to the main PC board. The only thing I have been able to find so far has been a right angle BNC connector for the 50 ohm input. Opinions welcomed! Pete ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages | Shortwave | |||
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters | General | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr | Equipment |