Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 08:04 AM
Eric F. Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Pete KE9OA" wrote:

I am finishing up the MW receiver..............anyway, I have a high
impedance antenna input in addition to the 50 ohm input. With this type of
receiver is the high impedance input enough, or would interested parties
rather have both inputs.
The reason I am asking this is because my employer would like to have all
jacks mounted to the main PC board. The only thing I have been able to find
so far has been a right angle BNC connector for the 50 ohm input.
Opinions welcomed!

Pete,

I'm in favor of the low-Z input myself. I wouldn't want to connect a
"wire" to any receiver without some robust -- and sacrificial --
isolation.

Would your boss be in favor of using (or recommending one of the
existing) an external impedence matching device with binding posts on
it?

Pete


Eric

--
Eric F. Richards

"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass,
often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940
  #2   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 01:00 PM
Pete KE9OA
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Eric,
I have decided to use an SO-239 for the low impedance input. For
the high impedance input, I will be using a Mini-Circuits 4:1 transformer.
The good thing about this approach is that the high impedance can come in at
the transformer input while the low impedance can come in between either one
of the balanced inputs and ground, the same way it is done in FM tuners.
This way, the low-pass image reject filter doesn't get perturbed. This also
eliminate the necessity of having an external matching device (believe me, I
considered this avenue!).

Pete

"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
"Pete KE9OA" wrote:

I am finishing up the MW receiver..............anyway, I have a high
impedance antenna input in addition to the 50 ohm input. With this type
of
receiver is the high impedance input enough, or would interested parties
rather have both inputs.
The reason I am asking this is because my employer would like to have all
jacks mounted to the main PC board. The only thing I have been able to
find
so far has been a right angle BNC connector for the 50 ohm input.
Opinions welcomed!

Pete,

I'm in favor of the low-Z input myself. I wouldn't want to connect a
"wire" to any receiver without some robust -- and sacrificial --
isolation.

Would your boss be in favor of using (or recommending one of the
existing) an external impedence matching device with binding posts on
it?

Pete


Eric

--
Eric F. Richards

"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass,
often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages RHF Shortwave 2 January 13th 05 11:58 PM
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters Jon Noring General 1 July 9th 04 07:25 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
stuff for all hams [email protected] General 0 December 19th 03 07:31 PM
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr Dave Hollander Equipment 0 December 8th 03 02:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017