LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old April 7th 05, 02:29 PM
Pete KE9OA
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This won't be a problem with my unit.....................I will use a panel
mount component, with either a two-bolt or a four-bolt mounting pattern.

Pete

"Tom Holden" wrote in message
.. .
"starman" wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
The "F" connectors are 75 ohm impedance.


Technically true for VHF and UHF but not that important for MW or HF
reception. I use R6U coax (75-ohm) for my HF antenna lead.


I agree - the supposed impedance mismatch is a non-issue at these
frequencies, connectorised CATV cable is available everywhere and cheap.
The SO-239 is overkill and you want to make sure it is solidly mounted
because it can be easily over-torqued. I wish they had used an F connector
on the DX-394 because the SO-239 on one of mine rotated and fractured the
solder pad on the pcb.

Tom



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages RHF Shortwave 2 January 13th 05 11:58 PM
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters Jon Noring General 1 July 9th 04 07:25 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
stuff for all hams [email protected] General 0 December 19th 03 07:31 PM
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr Dave Hollander Equipment 0 December 8th 03 02:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017