| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
SAKI,
|
"RHF" wrote in news:1112986918.033850.93890
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com: SAKI, . Along the West Coast : LA, SF, PO and SW could all have varrying reception reports. . Seat Down and Listen to each of these : 11.945 MHz 11.955 MHz 15.280 MHz 15.310 MHz 15.360 MHz 17.655 MHz 17.790 MHz Between 5 PM and 6 PM PDT . ymmv ~ RHF Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for; I'll try 'em out. ---- |
saki wrote:
I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- The BBC no longer uses 9525 as of 27 March. The new frequency is 9825-but only between 0200-0300, a broadcast of The World Today (current events), fine if your interest is news, otherwise you're out of luck. The East Asia service is audible in California on 15280 (Thailand) and 15360 (Singapore) after 0000, but that fades out after local sunrise in Asia around 0300. That also has a different schedule, for example it plays The World Today at 0000 according to the BBC website. The BBC has drastically cut back broadcasts to the Americas, probably with an eye on eliminating them entirely for A06, leaving us out in the cold. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA 5 inches is a pretty short wave, Sweetheart. |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA Main Entry: short·wave Pronunciation: 'short-"wAv Function: noun Usage: often attributive 1 : a radio wave having a wavelength between 10 and 100 meters 2 : a radio transmitter using shortwaves 3 : electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength equal to or less than that of visible light |
David wrote: On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA 5 inches is a pretty short wave, Sweetheart. Do you understand what the word 'terrestrial' means, 'tard? Take your meds and go tote it. dxAce Michigan USA |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA I just realized that the Webster's dictionary made a mistake. Radio waves have wavelengths greater than visible light, not less than. |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:41:34 GMT, David wrote:
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA I just realized that the Webster's dictionary made a mistake. Radio waves have wavelengths greater than visible light, not less than. Webster's just hasn't kept up with the times, and yes - there are errors as well as glaring omissions. Case in point: Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating. I make no claims for those this may apply to, let everyone decide that for themselves and enjoy a private laugh. BTW, Thanks for the All India Radio report David, got closer to a legit logging today - heard the voices but the audio was a bit too 'funky' for me to clearly ID ......... there's always the next day. Did you catch it on your R8 or SW2? |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:08:59 -0700, Howard
wrote: On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:41:34 GMT, David wrote: On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:06:25 -0400, dxAce wrote: David wrote: On 8 Apr 2005 17:21:40 GMT, saki wrote: I haven't heard the English service of the BBC on 9525 for a couple weeks and their 5975 service doesn't seem to be on before 0200 UTC. Last summer 11835 was in use at this time but doesn't seem to be used at the moment. Is there a reliable BBC frequency catchable on the USA west coast from 0000 or 0100? ---- XM Channel 131 Is that shortwave, 'tard boy? I see that you're getting off to a rather bad start again today. dxAce Michigan USA I just realized that the Webster's dictionary made a mistake. Radio waves have wavelengths greater than visible light, not less than. Webster's just hasn't kept up with the times, and yes - there are errors as well as glaring omissions. Case in point: Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating. I make no claims for those this may apply to, let everyone decide that for themselves and enjoy a private laugh. BTW, Thanks for the All India Radio report David, got closer to a legit logging today - heard the voices but the audio was a bit too 'funky' for me to clearly ID ......... there's always the next day. Did you catch it on your R8 or SW2? I got it on the R8B in my office which uses a 50' random wire driving a Palomar MLB which drives 2 [ea] 50' pieces of Radio Shack RG-58/U with a UHF barrel in the middle. I also got it on the ICOM R-75 in the kitchen, which is hooked up to about 150' of wire that goes through the garage, up a 25' mast on the corner of the yard, then slopes the length of the yard to the neighbor's fence. Didn't try the SW2, which is mainly for MW (Coast to Coast AM on KKOH, KGO for Bill Wattenburg, and the 2 Vegas flamethrowers). KFI comes in very badly here since their tower got knocked over. The SW2 is fed by an MFJ-1024 active on top of a 20' support pole (for one end of the R8B 50' wire). It also has 100' of RG-58/U. The SW2 is my AM bedside radio. A Tivoli Model One is my FM bedside radio. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com