wrote in message
oups.com...
The story is almost a year old:
Sun Jul 18th, 2004 at 22:51:39 PDT

Here are the CURRENT ratings:
http://www.radioandrecords.com/rrratings

Not as pretty a picture is it?????

Why do you think he posted it? The NEW ratings would have screwed up his
agenda.

On Tue, 3 May 2005 13:22:34 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
The story is almost a year old:
Sun Jul 18th, 2004 at 22:51:39 PDT

Here are the CURRENT ratings:
http://www.radioandrecords.com/rrratings

Not as pretty a picture is it?????

Why do you think he posted it? The NEW ratings would have screwed up his
agenda.

The link was in a contemporary article. It was an accident. As
usual, you missed the big picture while getting hung-up like a tweeker
on something insignificant.

David wrote:

On Tue, 3 May 2005 13:22:34 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
The story is almost a year old:
Sun Jul 18th, 2004 at 22:51:39 PDT

Here are the CURRENT ratings:
http://www.radioandrecords.com/rrratings

Not as pretty a picture is it?????

Why do you think he posted it? The NEW ratings would have screwed up his
agenda.

The link was in a contemporary article. It was an accident. As
usual, you missed the big picture while getting hung-up like a tweeker
on something insignificant.

You were an 'accident' yourself, 'tard boy. Your mama was mighty ****ed that
daddy didn't wear a condom.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"David" wrote in message
...

The link was in a contemporary article. It was an accident. As
usual, you missed the big picture while getting hung-up like a tweeker
on something insignificant.

You finally took a long time to admit that you're wrong, even though the
point was mentioned several times that your flawed reference (a self-serving
blog, at that) was about 10 months old. Then you complain that your being
caught lying was but a small point. (Typical radiclib behavior BTW. Been
there [PR of Madison], seen that before...)

Face it! The big picture to you is presenting black propaganda (talking
points, perhaps?) as truth and quietly backing down when confronted with the
facts. = Exit stage left, way left...

Let's see! The following was your original (bogus) post: I didn't see any
retraction of yours. I'm a technical editor (embedded micrprocessors) and
not a coward to admit when I'm in error. If you were a writer whom I edit,
I'd be all over you for your mistakes if you refuse to heed to reason.


"Majority Report is the #1 talk radio show in the 25-54 demographic in
NYC for its time slot.
Majority Report: 2.9
WABC: 2.7
WOR: 1.2
Who does WOR feature in that time slot? Savage and Laura Ingraham.
Air America came in as the second-highest-ranked talk network in NYC
across the board."

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 May 2005 13:22:34 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
The story is almost a year old:
Sun Jul 18th, 2004 at 22:51:39 PDT

Here are the CURRENT ratings:
http://www.radioandrecords.com/rrratings

Not as pretty a picture is it?????

Why do you think he posted it? The NEW ratings would have screwed up his
agenda.

The link was in a contemporary article. It was an accident. As
usual, you missed the big picture while getting hung-up like a tweeker
on something insignificant.

The big picture is AA is failing. You're the one with the hang-up.

"MnMikew" wrote in message
...

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 May 2005 13:22:34 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
The story is almost a year old:
Sun Jul 18th, 2004 at 22:51:39 PDT

Here are the CURRENT ratings:
http://www.radioandrecords.com/rrratings

Not as pretty a picture is it?????

Why do you think he posted it? The NEW ratings would have screwed up his
agenda.

The link was in a contemporary article. It was an accident. As
usual, you missed the big picture while getting hung-up like a tweeker
on something insignificant.

The big picture is AA is failing. You're the one with the hang-up.

It is not failing. It is very viable, but it is not the major factor in most
US markets that conservative talk is, mostly due tot he fact that in very
few markets is the programming on a competitive technical facility.