Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Kasupski wrote: On Tue, 03 May 2005 15:11:54 -0400, dxAce wrote: John Kasupski wrote: On Tue, 03 May 2005 13:47:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Coast Guard COMSTA Kodiak, Alaska coming in surprisingly well this afternoon on 8983 calling Coast Guard aircraft 6006 which seems a bit odd as the WUN site has 6006 homeplate as Mobile, Alabama. An aircraft's HOMEPLATE is merely that aircraft's "home" airfield, which is not necessarily the one from which it is operating. Hmmm...first you replied with this: No kidding... still a bit odd as the homeplate is GENERALLY where it does operate from. And the fact that Kodiak was trying to communicate with them simply indicates that a change may have taken place which is not currently listed on WUN. That might have gotten you somewhere, but then you had to duck into a phone booth, turn into Super Jerk, and come out with: I just love it when the debutantes think they are telling me something they think I don't know! Very well, Mr. Know-It-All, go ahead and stay stupid, and excuse me for trying to help. You can now go try to figure out for yourself why CG 6006 is operating from AIRSTA Sitka instead of ATC Mobile where it is homeplated, because I'm sure not going to tell you. Oh, and welcome to my killfile, which is already so loaded with mouthy, condescending jerks such as yourself that one more won't even be noticed. I'm sure I'll be able to figure it out. I have sources! And, I'm hardly 'stupid'. You offered no 'help' what so ever to begin with other than a simple dissertation on 'homeplate'. If you knew why CG 6006 was there at the time perhaps you should have stated such, instead you simply told me that you were a 'tard, and I appreciate that information. You were the original 'mouthy' one telling me what I already knew. See ya, 'tard boy! dxAce Michigan USA |