| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
I never listen to that silly nitwit Rush Limbaugh.I tried to when he
first came on the air for a couple of months back in the 1990's.I caught that numbskull in more lies and crap that he knows absolutely nothing about than y'all can shake a stick at.Kim Komando,the computer godess is on 1180 on on the AM band on my radio now.Go,Computer Godess,Kim Komando www.komando.com Go!,you sexy looking thang. cuhulin |
There was a big Dresden exibit here in Jackson,Mississippi a year or so
ago.Do a www.devilfinder.com for it,if you are interested.I also have a few videos of it.I went to it and I took a bunch of pictures with my Kodak camera and snail mailed some pictures to that married Irish woman wayyyy over yonder across the big pond.There have been some other big major exibits here in Jackson too,Spain and France to name a few.In September of this year,Celtic Fest Mississippi will be in Jackson,it is an annual event thingy,wild Horses can't keep me away. cuhulin |
Eric F. Richards wrote: "John S." wrote: Clearly you haven't heard of the firebombing of Tokyo, which was more destructive to lives than both atomic detonations together. And so what. Both the firebombing and the nuclear explosions were designed to get the Japanese to stop fighting a losing battle. One that would have cost our side and theirs huge numbers of killed had a land invasion taken place. The point, which you seem to have missed, too, is that just because it used a fission reaction doesn't make it the ultimate evil. Tokyo, Dresden, Koln were all far more destructive. I'm not talking about motives here, so spare me. The POINT is, the nukes were destructive as in what a single bomb could do, but they sure as hell weren't when compared mission-for-mission. You are confusing issues here. In the firebombing of tokyo, london, dresden or koln there were numerous devices used which resulted in numerous highly destuctive fires. In the two separate nuclear bomb attacks on japan one device was used in each attack with extreme destruction the result. I would have far rather been 5 miles away from Hiroshima than 5 miles away from Dresden. I suspect even at that distance I could have been sucked in by the firestorm. Chances are you would have been killed or seriously maimed for life by radiation at a 5 mile distance. -- Eric F. Richards "The weird part is that I can feel productive even when I'm doomed." - Dilbert |
www.devilfinder.com World War Two The Magician (Jasper Maskelyne) I
have the pocket book here,I have read it only once,many years ago.It is an interesting read.If y'all are interested? cuhulin |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:44:07 -0500, wrote:
Look,leave my dog out of this.She has never been abused.I challenge anybody to come to 1304 Denson Ave,Jackson,Mississippi and lets take her to any veteranarian of your choice.Put your money where your mouth is! cuhulin Better than putting money where your mouth has been. huh, Blueberry. |
kashe,you just proved yourself to be another one of those Morons.
cuhulin |
"John S." wrote:
You are confusing issues here. No, I'm not. You are, or you are being deliberatly obtuse. The point is, the firebombings KILLED MORE PEOPLE. They were more DESTRUCTIVE. End of story. So, which was "more evil?" (which is a bull**** construct, but lets leave that alone for now...) Killing 75,000 people with a nuke? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries, timing the individual waves to catch fire and rescue people in the open and unprotected? (read up on Dresden.) In the firebombing of tokyo, london, dresden or koln there were numerous devices used which resulted in numerous highly destuctive fires. In the two separate nuclear bomb attacks on japan one device was used in each attack with extreme destruction the result. I would have far rather been 5 miles away from Hiroshima than 5 miles away from Dresden. I suspect even at that distance I could have been sucked in by the firestorm. Chances are you would have been killed or seriously maimed for life by radiation at a 5 mile distance. Check your facts. -- Eric F. Richards "The weird part is that I can feel productive even when I'm doomed." - Dilbert |
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:23:10 -0600, Eric F. Richards
wrote: "John S." wrote: You are confusing issues here. No, I'm not. You are, or you are being deliberatly obtuse. The point is, the firebombings KILLED MORE PEOPLE. They were more DESTRUCTIVE. End of story. So, which was "more evil?" (which is a bull**** construct, but lets leave that alone for now...) Killing 75,000 people with a nuke? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries, timing the individual waves to catch fire and rescue people in the open and unprotected? (read up on Dresden.) In the firebombing of tokyo, london, dresden or koln there were numerous devices used which resulted in numerous highly destuctive fires. In the two separate nuclear bomb attacks on japan one device was used in each attack with extreme destruction the result. I would have far rather been 5 miles away from Hiroshima than 5 miles away from Dresden. I suspect even at that distance I could have been sucked in by the firestorm. Chances are you would have been killed or seriously maimed for life by radiation at a 5 mile distance. Check your facts. Amazing. |
John S. wrote: You do know that what you have said constuites a act of treason ? So tell me what is an act of treason. It reads like the nonsense ramblings of someone who sees conspiracies everywhere. But hat's about it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with dissidents in our country...I fought for your right to speak out for your views and rights...anything else would be an tolitarian in nature. Now I am tired of all you cowards accusing the United States of all of the worlds' wrongs. I work and live, and had fought in all of these cess pools you cry afoul the USA for. Fact is the world is an evil and inhumane place. Without the USA, we'd already have WWIII. As far as the USA as being racial, pack your lazy butt up and try to come over here to the Middle East, esp. Saudia Arabia. Freedom of religion...of speech...of where you live....documents every 6 months is a minimum...it's Isalm or nothing else...an responsibility for one's own misfortune or the country's is unheard of and definitely unpracticed over here. The professional people schooled and had lived in the USA like and understand us; but the remainder are so full of hate taught to them from cradle to grave. To keep a people in line, you must find an outside element. Western civilization is it....they do not like to work, and children and women are possessions here...foreign workers from the Third World are slaves with impossibly low wages that they can hardly return home. Poor little Japan and bad, bad USA and her nukes. Well you liberal idiots...let me put you on those battlefields with the odds not in your favor with every new battle of ever coming home....and considering the Japanese posture on Okinawa, the BOMB saved lives on all sides. War means never having to say you are sorry. If we had treated the Arabs as they treat others, and gave Islam the little freedom that we give their religion all over the world, IRaq and the terrrorists would be finished by now. Instead of our soldiers dying for your poor, ignorant views, why not sign up and put your life on the line for America...earn your citizenship for a change. We need the draft reistated then we'd get to see y'all in a truer light. Facing death is the ultimate test of manhood next to parenting. You, my firned, keep being a dissenter...maybe one day your fellow citizens will get off their lazy behinds, research the clowns they put in DC, and put America and her people as number one in the congressional agendas. CEOs and the citizens lack of responsibilty are tearing Aemrica apart. Unless you like working at Buger King or MacDonald's, then be a real American and do something other than paying taxes and opening your yap about things you ever seen, or experienced first hand. And if CNN is your prime source of information on the world, see who has a large financial interest and editorial contro there...as per Jim Clancy, they read what they are told to...and an Arab financier is not about to let CNN show you anyhting but a dynamic corner of a terribly raped and frustrated culture at the hands of despots and religious quacks. |
Cuhulin has a dog fetish; hence, I call him the Beastmaster. His dog's
name is Blueberry and I'll leave it to you to connect the disgusting dots. Cheers John Barnard "John S." wrote: The Beastmaster and Blueberry....huh???????? |
|
I am not a terrorist and I do not support terrorist or terrorism.(sure,I
like the Irish Republican Army,sue me!) Terrorist is U.S.federal government. cuhulin |
On 31 Jul 2005 10:56:18 -0700, "Polly" wrote:
Nobody wants to visit your neighborhood unless they are carrying a weapon of some sort. That area is rampant with jungle bunnies. Quit cornholing that dog and nobody will respond to your bestiality. George Ashley W4FQF Just when I was thinking about becoming an Amateur Radio operator I am reminded of the groupthink extant in that avocation. |
"David" wrote in message Just when I was thinking about becoming an Amateur Radio operator I am reminded of the groupthink extant in that avocation. And we thank you Mr. Rickets. No sense in accelerating the depravity. Oh Yea? F.U. too George! B.H. |
From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:08:11 GMT Subject: Defusing a Nuclear Nightmare On 31 Jul 2005 10:56:18 -0700, "Polly" wrote: Nobody wants to visit your neighborhood unless they are carrying a weapon of some sort. That area is rampant with jungle bunnies. Quit cornholing that dog and nobody will respond to your bestiality. George Ashley W4FQF Just when I was thinking about becoming an Amateur Radio operator I am reminded of the groupthink extant in that avocation. David, that guy doesn't represent amateur radio. Most hams I have met are good, intelligent folks. Greg |
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:29:01 GMT, Greg wrote:
From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:08:11 GMT Subject: Defusing a Nuclear Nightmare On 31 Jul 2005 10:56:18 -0700, "Polly" wrote: Nobody wants to visit your neighborhood unless they are carrying a weapon of some sort. That area is rampant with jungle bunnies. Quit cornholing that dog and nobody will respond to your bestiality. George Ashley W4FQF Just when I was thinking about becoming an Amateur Radio operator I am reminded of the groupthink extant in that avocation. David, that guy doesn't represent amateur radio. Most hams I have met are good, intelligent folks. Greg When I lived in Texas I'd listen to a net on 3853. Everybody was a drunk, out of control redneck bigot. |
David wrote: On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:29:01 GMT, Greg wrote: From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:08:11 GMT Subject: Defusing a Nuclear Nightmare On 31 Jul 2005 10:56:18 -0700, "Polly" wrote: Nobody wants to visit your neighborhood unless they are carrying a weapon of some sort. That area is rampant with jungle bunnies. Quit cornholing that dog and nobody will respond to your bestiality. George Ashley W4FQF Just when I was thinking about becoming an Amateur Radio operator I am reminded of the groupthink extant in that avocation. David, that guy doesn't represent amateur radio. Most hams I have met are good, intelligent folks. Greg When I lived in Texas I'd listen to a net on 3853. Everybody was a drunk, out of control redneck bigot. And now, here you are on RRS, a drug addled, out of control racist 'tard. The more things change, the more they stay the same. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Polly want a cracker? I don't do beasties.I prefer my human two legged
wimmins.My mind isn't in the gutter like some of y'alls are.Ginger Rogers is pedaling barb wire in this movie on tv,The First Traveling Saleslady.Some kinds of old barb wire is worth a lot of money.Do some research on that and get your head out of your a.. cuhulin |
I think I might sic some nasty ugly wimmin on Polly.I know where
he/she/it lives. cuhulin |
"Amazing" in what way? That I don't drink your kool-aid? That I
consider more people being killed as more bad, even though it didn't involve a -- GASP -- nuke? Since you need it spelled out in simple terms, go to a library (aside: when there, don't pronounce it "lie-barry" -- they'll laugh), pick up this month's National Geographic, and read the story on the 60th anniversary. It'w written in simple, easy to understand english, so you'll get it, and there are pictures too, just in case the english is too tiring on you. There's even a picture taken from 5 miles away from a 15 kiloton (Hiroshima-sized) strike, with a bunch of troops. Good luck at trying to open your mind to a new concept. David wrote: On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:23:10 -0600, Eric F. Richards wrote: "John S." wrote: You are confusing issues here. No, I'm not. You are, or you are being deliberatly obtuse. The point is, the firebombings KILLED MORE PEOPLE. They were more DESTRUCTIVE. End of story. So, which was "more evil?" (which is a bull**** construct, but lets leave that alone for now...) Killing 75,000 people with a nuke? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries? Killing 300,000 people with incindiaries, timing the individual waves to catch fire and rescue people in the open and unprotected? (read up on Dresden.) In the firebombing of tokyo, london, dresden or koln there were numerous devices used which resulted in numerous highly destuctive fires. In the two separate nuclear bomb attacks on japan one device was used in each attack with extreme destruction the result. I would have far rather been 5 miles away from Hiroshima than 5 miles away from Dresden. I suspect even at that distance I could have been sucked in by the firestorm. Chances are you would have been killed or seriously maimed for life by radiation at a 5 mile distance. Check your facts. Amazing. |
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:30:36 -0600, Eric F. Richards
wrote: "Amazing" in what way? That I don't drink your kool-aid? That I consider more people being killed as more bad, even though it didn't involve a -- GASP -- nuke? Since you need it spelled out in simple terms, go to a library (aside: when there, don't pronounce it "lie-barry" -- they'll laugh), pick up this month's National Geographic, and read the story on the 60th anniversary. It'w written in simple, easy to understand english, so you'll get it, and there are pictures too, just in case the english is too tiring on you. There's even a picture taken from 5 miles away from a 15 kiloton (Hiroshima-sized) strike, with a bunch of troops. Good luck at trying to open your mind to a new concept. Fascinating... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com