Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 22nd 05, 11:49 PM
Cmd Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jwb wrote:
what would be a major diffrence in shortwave reception using a transceiver
like a icom 725 compared to using just a shortwave reciever like icom r-75?
thanks jack



There would be very little if any difference. In a transceiver you are
paying for the transmitting part of the radio as well as the receiving
part. Now unless you have a license to get some use out of the
transmitting part, then you have wasted some of your money.
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 23rd 05, 03:19 AM
Henry Kolesnik
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yaesu, Kenwood and Icom have all made receivers that looked like they were a
copy of the transceiver(or is that verse vica?), but looks can be deceiving.
My guess is that probably ten times as many transceivers are sold and as a
result they don't cost that much more than a look-a-like receiver. I
haven't done that much checking but IIRC they always add a few bells and
whistles to the receiver as well as a built in power supply. Granted a
transceiver will use more current and run hotter. As far as performance on
the ham bands in SSB would probably favor the transceiver and performance in
the AM SWL bands would probably favor the receiver. One definite advantage
of getting the transceiver is if the SWL wants to be a ham he is one step
closer with the equipment.

--

73
Hank WD5JFR
"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
jwb wrote:
what would be a major diffrence in shortwave reception using a
transceiver like a icom 725 compared to using just a shortwave reciever
like icom r-75?
thanks jack



There would be very little if any difference. In a transceiver you are
paying for the transmitting part of the radio as well as the receiving
part. Now unless you have a license to get some use out of the
transmitting part, then you have wasted some of your money.



  #3   Report Post  
Old May 23rd 05, 06:34 PM
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:19:49 GMT, "jwb" wrote:

what would be a major diffrence in shortwave reception using a transceiver
like a icom 725 compared to using just a shortwave reciever like icom r-75?
thanks jack


I'd say the major difference is many SWave receivers minimize signal
fading with "synchronious selectable sideband" circuitry. I don't know
of any ham transceiver that has that feature. The Icom R-75 reciever
doesn't have it either, but most of the medium-to-better receivers,
such as the Sonys, the Drakes, do.

Bob
k5qwg



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 3 November 1st 04 04:31 AM
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 0 November 1st 04 04:26 AM
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 0 November 1st 04 04:26 AM
FS: Drake TR270 Transceiver David Black Equipment 0 July 21st 03 10:09 PM
FS: Drake TR270 Transceiver David Black Swap 0 July 21st 03 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017