|
Honus wrote:
Free speech must really irritate you and your type. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1404701/posts He's not dead. That was a hoax that he perpetrated himself. So, he's as honourable as Fort? mike |
beerbarrel wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2005 04:36:17 GMT, m II wrote: beerbarrel wrote: http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org Turning into a lying asshole now? I've NEVER emailed anyone on this newsgroup. This is exactly the sort of dishonesty used to start the war on Iraq. I can't expect any sort of moral values from your type..you mirror your leadership very well. mike Now you are trying to wiggle out? You know what you did. One thing is certain... the two words, leadership and CanaDuh, do not go together. dxAce Michigan USA |
beerbarrel wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:33:26 -0400, dxAce wrote: beerbarrel wrote: On Fri, 27 May 2005 04:36:17 GMT, m II wrote: beerbarrel wrote: http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org Turning into a lying asshole now? I've NEVER emailed anyone on this newsgroup. This is exactly the sort of dishonesty used to start the war on Iraq. I can't expect any sort of moral values from your type..you mirror your leadership very well. mike Now you are trying to wiggle out? You know what you did. One thing is certain... the two words, leadership and CanaDuh, do not go together. dxAce Michigan USA He is sorta starting to sound like Bryant... Amazing, isn't it? dxAce Michigan USA |
"m II" wrote in message news:wryle.24695$tt5.5149@edtnps90... Honus wrote: Free speech must really irritate you and your type. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1404701/posts He's not dead. That was a hoax that he perpetrated himself. So, he's as honourable as Fort? As in Fortean? |
m II wrote: beerbarrel wrote: http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org Looks like you've been busy. Why did you have to murder him, you lying *******? Free speech must really irritate you and your type. The only thing that's really irritating are dumb Canucky boys who don't seem to know their true place in the world, let alone anything about shortwave. Stuff a sock in it, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
"FDR" wrote in message ... "running dogg" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! Mr. Crook doesn't know history very well; those without a military tend to get run over by those who do. He may not like the Iraq war, but effectively disbanding the military by eliminating all forms of recompense is akin to asking to get clobbered over the head. --Mike L. I wouldn't go THAT far, but I DO think that the US military needs a total, top down reconstruction. A modern guerilla insurgency (like the one in Iraq) will run circles around a typical bureaucratic military structure (like the US armed forces) because the big military bureaucracy has absolutely no way of responding to the tactics of the insurgents as fast as the insurgents can change said tactics. We now = British circa 1776. They = colonial army circa 1776. No. During the WoI, one of the main goals of Washington's army was to beat the British on the field so as to legitimize the Revolution. Washington felt that employing guerrilla tactics against the British, even if successful, would not lend to the legitamacy of the Revolution as much as being able to beat the British, then one of the finest militaries of the time, on the field. --Mike L. |
"FDR" wrote in message ... "Brian Hill" wrote in message So our jails are filled with terrorists, not murders? Do I really have to explain to you how stupid that statement is? B.H. |
Michael Lawson wrote:
"FDR" wrote in message ... "running dogg" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! Mr. Crook doesn't know history very well; those without a military tend to get run over by those who do. He may not like the Iraq war, but effectively disbanding the military by eliminating all forms of recompense is akin to asking to get clobbered over the head. --Mike L. I wouldn't go THAT far, but I DO think that the US military needs a total, top down reconstruction. A modern guerilla insurgency (like the one in Iraq) will run circles around a typical bureaucratic military structure (like the US armed forces) because the big military bureaucracy has absolutely no way of responding to the tactics of the insurgents as fast as the insurgents can change said tactics. We now = British circa 1776. They = colonial army circa 1776. No. During the WoI, one of the main goals of Washington's army was to beat the British on the field so as to legitimize the Revolution. Washington felt that employing guerrilla tactics against the British, even if successful, would not lend to the legitamacy of the Revolution as much as being able to beat the British, then one of the finest militaries of the time, on the field. There are other differences. The colonials didn't kill civilians. Well, there were a few atrocities, but nothing like the daily onslaught against civilian populations that we see in Iraq. Also, there was no religious component to the colonial rebellion; they wanted self rule and freedom from taxes, not a religiously pure state. No suicide missions, either. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
dxAce wrote:
m II wrote: beerbarrel wrote: http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org Looks like you've been busy. Why did you have to murder him, you lying *******? Free speech must really irritate you and your type. The only thing that's really irritating are dumb Canucky boys who don't seem to know their true place in the world, let alone anything about shortwave. Stuff a sock in it, boy. dxAce Michigan USA shove it up your ass, retard. |
beerbarrel wrote: On Sat, 28 May 2005 05:05:33 GMT, m II wrote: dxAce wrote: m II wrote: beerbarrel wrote: http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ What a guy he really is! _____________________ www.ReformUS.org Looks like you've been busy. Why did you have to murder him, you lying *******? Free speech must really irritate you and your type. The only thing that's really irritating are dumb Canucky boys who don't seem to know their true place in the world, let alone anything about shortwave. Stuff a sock in it, boy. dxAce Michigan USA shove it up your ass, retard. I don't think dxace wants to take up your hobbies! I sure don't. dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com