Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:15:15 GMT, Telamon
wrote: About the only right, on topic comment you made out of a long post was about signal to noise being most important factor in the receiving antenna system. Hi OM, That was not me, and given that inaccuracy in reporting (says something doesn't it?) makes the following suspect: AND... I'm not somebody's old wife. I'm not a CB'er. I have a clear head. I understand how BALUNs work. I did not imagine it or indulge in wishful thinking and the improvement wasn't just by chance. I'm not waiting to buy a Chinese portable. I understand the economics of electronic engineering. Since most of your 119 line post is pure disregard for anyone else's experience or opinion I may have missed some. This last comment of course, is prophetic by example with an obvious negative expectation. ;-) If you can't make a non condescending on topic post then go away please. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? | Antenna | |||
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Shortwave |