LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 1st 05, 02:33 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jwb" wrote:

how is the performance of this receiver
any good?
---------------------------------------
I have two R2000s and love them.
They are not AOR7030+, but they are
very good workaday receivers.

In many (?most?) locations the background
RF noise will limit how sensitive a receiver
needs to be.

The R2000 is rated by Sherwood Labs, a respected
player in the RF game, as having a noise floor -130db.
If you local noise floor is -110dB , then anything more
sensitive won't help you.

The stock filters in the R2000 are "OK", the AM-W is
too wide, but the narrow is likely to be aceptable.

Given that you can pickup a good R2000 for less then $300,
and a AOR7030+ will run over $1500 for a basic version
and go go over 2K with all the treats, the R2000 is pretty good.

At the very least it will make a great beginner's radio, and if your
interest hangs in there you can always rob a bank to buy the
7030+.

There are some very simple mods that make the R2000 a much
better receiver. Frank C decyphered the adjustable BFO mod that
makes SSB/CW/FSK a lot more fun, and allow the use of SSB to
receive AM for crowded conditions.

Go to:
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
for a comparison of common good radios.

Sadly the list doesn't include the ATS909/ DX398.
A nice basic receiver that the ARRL rated as having a
noise floor of 0.08uV at 14MHz which equals -129dBm.
(At least if my brain hasn't been fried by being outside for
the last 4 days playing radio).

And while the rated sensitivities are nearly the same,
The R2000 is much more sensitive the the DX398.
My wife and I each own a DX398 and I own 2 R2000s.
I have compared the 2 different recivers under many
conditions and I just don't trust the ARRL figures.

There is much more the sensitivity to consider.
The Drake SW radios have a much lower phase noise
then the R2000 and this noise is like a thin vail bewteen
you and the signal. But any of the good Drakes are going
to cost much more then a R2000. And for most listening
the difference is minimal. For real weak signal work, after
you find a RF quite location then the Drakes will outshine
the R2000.
But not by that much.

Go to:
http://www.qsl.net/kc7bum/
for R2000 owners and service manauls and some usefull mods.

Terry

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kenwood 2000 LeoBlues Shortwave 13 April 28th 05 08:07 PM
Kenwood R-5000 (R5000) Receiver - Information and Resources RHF Shortwave 1 January 17th 05 02:03 PM
VT Communications B'04 Mike Terry Shortwave 1 October 12th 04 08:14 PM
2000 Kenwood $ 1,295.00 K5JOE Swap 0 October 21st 03 10:41 PM
WANT KENWOOD PAINT FOR TS 2000 K9ike Swap 1 October 8th 03 11:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017