RHF wrote:

DaviD,
.
" stacking the military with crazies. "
.
So this is what 'you' think of the Brave Men
and Women who serve in the US Military ?
.
Or are you just referring to the Officers
who Lead them ?
.
DaviD - Why do 'you' Hate and Disrespect
our American Soldiers ?
.
God {Allah} Bless America - Amen ~ RHF
[ God Bless All Those Who Serve in America's
Uniforms - amen, Amen. and AMEN ! ]
.


I think David needs a good, old fashioned, military "Blanket party".
Don't forget to bring the scrub brushes and caustic floor cleaner for
the after party cleanup. I served, and made it home. others didn't,
and this little piece of crap hides behind a computer monitor and calls
the military names. That isn't very smart, is it?

If they were as corrupt as he claims, they would have sent a special
ops team to his home and blown it off the face of the earth.

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:08:48 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

RHF wrote:

DaviD,
.
" stacking the military with crazies. "
.
So this is what 'you' think of the Brave Men
and Women who serve in the US Military ?
.
Or are you just referring to the Officers
who Lead them ?
.
DaviD - Why do 'you' Hate and Disrespect
our American Soldiers ?
.
God {Allah} Bless America - Amen ~ RHF
[ God Bless All Those Who Serve in America's
Uniforms - amen, Amen. and AMEN ! ]
.


I think David needs a good, old fashioned, military "Blanket party".
Don't forget to bring the scrub brushes and caustic floor cleaner for
the after party cleanup. I served, and made it home. others didn't,
and this little piece of crap hides behind a computer monitor and calls
the military names. That isn't very smart, is it?

If they were as corrupt as he claims, they would have sent a special
ops team to his home and blown it off the face of the earth.
All evangelical Rapture Right proponents are ****ing bonkers, whether
they disgrace the uniform or not.

#26 David: ""Rumsfeld claims many of these ''detainees'' were snatched
off the battlefield but refuses to treat them as prisoners of war.
Can't do that. ""

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.

On 3 Jul 2005 19:43:45 -0700, "Hatfield"
wrote:

#26 David: ""Rumsfeld claims many of these ''detainees'' were snatched
off the battlefield but refuses to treat them as prisoners of war.
Can't do that. ""

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.

Hats.

Hatfield wrote:
#26 David: ""Rumsfeld claims many of these ''detainees'' were snatched
off the battlefield but refuses to treat them as prisoners of war.
Can't do that. ""

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.


So, the thousands of snipers now in the pay of the US government are
international criminals?





mike

In article .com,
Hatfield wrote:

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.

That means that any group that's too poor to afford more than one
set of clothes will always be regarded as terrorists. How very
Republican.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident

Mark Zenier wrote:

In article .com,
Hatfield wrote:

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.

That means that any group that's too poor to afford more than one
set of clothes will always be regarded as terrorists. How very
Republican.

Damn, you sure are stupid.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:49:34 GMT, (Mark Zenier)
wrote:

In article .com,
Hatfield wrote:

All depends on whether they were in military uniform or not. Anyone in
combat on the battlefield who is dressed as civilian, or not otherwise
clearly displaying his side by recognizable military insignia, has
forfeited all his international rights, and is a criminal according to
international law.

That means that any group that's too poor to afford more than one
set of clothes will always be regarded as terrorists. How very
Republican.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident

Good point Mark, but if THAT isn't the case, we will think of some
other way to categorize them as terrorists, which justifies ANY
torture we want to give them. If those were Americans we would
be thumping the table really hard... or WOULD we?

Terrorists have many sets of clothes. You will soon discover.


That means that any group that's too poor to afford more than one
set of clothes will always be regarded as terrorists. How very
Republican.

Mark Zenier Washington State resident

Tai Ping Yang wrote:

Terrorists have many sets of clothes. You will soon discover.


I'll say! We have a mainland Chinese guy at work. He spends half the day
photocopying oil field equipment blueprints and schematics, which he then takes
home nightly. He NEVER brings anything back.

This is a real moral dilemma. Should I borrow fifty bucks from him before I turn
him in to the Feds? Having just learned that there are over a thousand communist
Chinese spies in North America, the odds are pretty good that he is one.

I think I'll make it hundred bucks...








mike