RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Who needs the ARRL, anyway? (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/74335-who-needs-arrl-anyway.html)

Who Needs The ARRL? July 10th 05 06:27 AM

Who needs the ARRL, anyway?
 
The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating,
demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in
the United States.
Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A
glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of
the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more
spam)
Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the
FCC has ever given that much credence.

I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is
a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially
those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members.

One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things,
such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another
wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty
Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the
elitism.
The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with
those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the
elitism.

CQ Contest, anyone?




Joe S. July 10th 05 12:06 PM



"Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote in message
...
The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is

self-propagating,
demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs

in
the United States.
Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee?

A
glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections

of
the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more
spam)
Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if

the
FCC has ever given that much credence.

I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it

is
a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL

cards...especially
those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life

Members.

One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better

things,
such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another
wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty
Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice

the
elitism.
The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak

with
those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the
elitism.

CQ Contest, anyone?



|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 +10dB +20dB
Troll-O-Meter

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 +10dB +20dB
Dumbass-O-Meter



AKC owns this NG July 10th 05 02:14 PM



Who Needs The ARRL? wrote:
The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating,
demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in
the United States.
Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A
glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of
the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more
spam)
Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the
FCC has ever given that much credence.

I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is
a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially
those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members.

One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things,
such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another
wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty
Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the
elitism.
The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with
those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the
elitism.

CQ Contest, anyone?


That's just twitlips convincing himself and nobody else that he can
write. The queenboy aint even a ham.


Caveat Lector July 10th 05 03:46 PM

ONLY GAME IN TOWN

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !



Korbin Dallas July 10th 05 03:50 PM

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 06:14:19 -0700, AKC owns this NG wrote:



Who Needs The ARRL? wrote:


I'm surprised you found the news groups since you seem too stupid to
understand that the ARRL does...

--
Korbin Dallas
The name was changed to protect the guilty.


Tim July 10th 05 06:54 PM

Seeing 50 & 60 year old men paste "ARRL Member" stickers
all over their cars, then go out on the highway and chase truck
drivers around to see what frequency they are on, has got to one
of the most hilarious things anyone has ever seen.

Tim




Cmd Buzz Corey July 10th 05 09:36 PM

Who Needs The ARRL? wrote:

Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the
FCC has ever given that much credence.


You don't have to be an ARRL member to vote on proposed rule changes,
but I guess a troll wouldn't know that.

Cmd Buzz Corey July 10th 05 09:38 PM

Tim wrote:
Seeing 50 & 60 year old men paste "ARRL Member" stickers
all over their cars, then go out on the highway and chase truck
drivers around to see what frequency they are on, has got to one
of the most hilarious things anyone has ever seen.

Tim



Have you seen it? How many? Where were they? What highway? How do you
know they were chasing trucks?

Not Roger 2 July 10th 05 11:33 PM


"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Who Needs The ARRL? wrote:

Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if

the
FCC has ever given that much credence.


You don't have to be an ARRL member to vote on proposed rule changes,
but I guess a troll wouldn't know that.


Read the post again, this time without moving your lips. Nowhere did it
state that one must be an ARRL member in order to vote on proposed rule
changes.



Mike Coslo July 10th 05 11:47 PM

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Tim wrote:

Seeing 50 & 60 year old men paste "ARRL Member" stickers
all over their cars, then go out on the highway and chase truck
drivers around to see what frequency they are on, has got to one
of the most hilarious things anyone has ever seen.

Tim



Have you seen it? How many? Where were they? What highway? How do you
know they were chasing trucks?



And whats the deal with 50 and 60 y.o. men anyhow? That's the age when
people become president, move into the upper management positions, and
generally run things....

sunnavagun!


- Mike KB3EIA -


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com