Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 02:30 PM
D Peter Maus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David wrote:
On 18 Jul 2005 02:45:00 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Sat 16 Jul 2005 08:12:43p, David wrote in message
m:


On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:40:39 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight.

B.H.


This page is Fair and Balanced - just like Fox News!!
Prominent Democrats
....


You listed the current crop of demoncrats that would treat global terrorism
as a problem for cops and lawyers, despite decades of their method returning
zero results. We now have an administration that is taking the fight to the
terrorists. It is within the realm of possibilities that one day you may come
to realize that speeding the jihadist to martyrdom is the *only* proven
effective method for preventing a terrorist from committing another terrorist
act.

*note for everyone else - When I said "realm of possibilities", I did not
mean to imply "realistic realm of possibilities". After all, he is "rickets"
and the broadest range of latitude is required...

-=jd=-


Holding hands with a Saudi prince who has weekly public beheadings is
''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Flying the Bin Ladens out of
the country September 13, 2001, without letting the FBI interrogate
them is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''?



Facts being stubborn things:


Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the
decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own
initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it
during the campaign.


But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at
least, THANK GOD, he was on topic.


As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of
the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent.


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 03:28 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I much prefer taking the war on terrorism and the terrorist to them in
their countries than here in America.However,there are terrorist here in
America and they are coming across our borders,so that needs to be dealt
with too.
cuhulin

  #4   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 04:26 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:



Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the
decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own
initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it
during the campaign.


But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at
least, THANK GOD, he was on topic.


As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of
the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent.


It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders.

The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg

You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale
and bad for you.

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 04:28 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:



Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the
decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own
initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it
during the campaign.


But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at
least, THANK GOD, he was on topic.


As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of
the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent.


It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders.

The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg

You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale
and bad for you.


You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it!

dxAce
Michigan
USA




  #6   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 04:41 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:28:45 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it!

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Still sweating from a 45 minute tote in the hills. Thanks for caring!

  #7   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 04:39 PM
D Peter Maus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:



Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the
decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own
initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it
during the campaign.


But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at
least, THANK GOD, he was on topic.


As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of
the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent.



It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders.




No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission.
Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting
to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country
according to protocols.




The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.



Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi
culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and
some quite barbaric here.

There have been conversations about from/to both sides.



You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale
and bad for you.


Thank you, it HAS been a long day.




  #8   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 05:32 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:


No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission.
Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting
to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country
according to protocols.




The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.



Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi
culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and
some quite barbaric here.

There have been conversations about from/to both sides.



Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he
approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with
complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the
FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former
Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate
Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003.




  #9   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 06:10 PM
D Peter Maus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:



No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission.
Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting
to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country
according to protocols.




The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.



Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi
culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and
some quite barbaric here.

There have been conversations about from/to both sides.




Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he
approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with
complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the
FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former
Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate
Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003.




LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement
that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you
had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my
mistakees and then underscore my point for me.

GOD, I love the internet.

"Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only
underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his
own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you
for confirming that for me.

And that his initiative and his procedures were approved.

Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're
determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation.


Thanks, David. You made my day.


p





  #10   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 06:15 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



D Peter Maus wrote:

David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:



No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission.
Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting
to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country
according to protocols.




The Prince's own government has the public beheadings.


Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi
culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and
some quite barbaric here.

There have been conversations about from/to both sides.




Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he
approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with
complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the
FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former
Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate
Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003.



LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement
that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you
had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my
mistakees and then underscore my point for me.

GOD, I love the internet.

"Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only
underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his
own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you
for confirming that for me.

And that his initiative and his procedures were approved.

Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're
determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation.

Thanks, David. You made my day.


Made mine also as I was sitting here wondering after he posted that if he
understood the English language at all.

dxAce
Michigan
USA




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bring me up to date... Professor CB 8 July 15th 05 09:46 AM
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush shephed General 0 July 13th 03 04:02 AM
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush [email protected] Scanner 1 July 13th 03 04:02 AM
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush shephed Shortwave 0 July 13th 03 04:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017