Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On 18 Jul 2005 02:45:00 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Sat 16 Jul 2005 08:12:43p, David wrote in message m: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:40:39 -0500, "Brian Hill" wrote: Democrats are pussies! They don't know how fight. B.H. This page is Fair and Balanced - just like Fox News!! Prominent Democrats .... You listed the current crop of demoncrats that would treat global terrorism as a problem for cops and lawyers, despite decades of their method returning zero results. We now have an administration that is taking the fight to the terrorists. It is within the realm of possibilities that one day you may come to realize that speeding the jihadist to martyrdom is the *only* proven effective method for preventing a terrorist from committing another terrorist act. *note for everyone else - When I said "realm of possibilities", I did not mean to imply "realistic realm of possibilities". After all, he is "rickets" and the broadest range of latitude is required... -=jd=- Holding hands with a Saudi prince who has weekly public beheadings is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Flying the Bin Ladens out of the country September 13, 2001, without letting the FBI interrogate them is ''taking the fight to the terrorists''? Facts being stubborn things: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I much prefer taking the war on terrorism and the terrorist to them in
their countries than here in America.However,there are terrorist here in America and they are coming across our borders,so that needs to be dealt with too. cuhulin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/715000...ution96300.jpg You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it! dxAce Michigan USA |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:28:45 -0400, dxAce
wrote: You need to get on out in the fresh air and tote it! dxAce Michigan USA Still sweating from a 45 minute tote in the hills. Thanks for caring! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:30:17 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Actually, that was Wesley Clark. He admitted to having made the decision to let the Bin Ladens out of the country on his own initiative. He made this admission publicly, and reiterated it during the campaign. But I'm sure he was listening to HF radio at the time. So, at least, THANK GOD, he was on topic. As for the Saudi Prince...he's publicly condemned the actions of the Muslim extremists responsible for the beheadings of the innocent. It was Richard Clarke, acting under direct orders. No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. You really need to get out of the bubble. The air in there is stale and bad for you. Thank you, it HAS been a long day. ![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my mistakees and then underscore my point for me. GOD, I love the internet. "Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you for confirming that for me. And that his initiative and his procedures were approved. Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation. Thanks, David. You made my day. p |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() D Peter Maus wrote: David wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:39:29 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: No, he was acting on his own initiative, by his own admission. Publicly stating so. He personally vetted the family members requesting to leave, and he personally authorized them to exit the country according to protocols. The Prince's own government has the public beheadings. Public beheadings, as barbaric as they are, are part of the Saudi culture, and part of the legal system. Just as we have executions, and some quite barbaric here. There have been conversations about from/to both sides. Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has testified that he approved these flights, stating that "it was a conscious decision with complete review at the highest levels of the State Department and the FBI and the White House." Testimony of Richard Clarke, Former Counterterrorism Chief, National Security Council, before The Senate Judiciary Committee, September 3, 2003. LOL! What's so interesting, is that you led off with a statement that's so blatantly false, and when I rebut, you come back and admit you had knowledge of the truth. So much so that you could correct my mistakees and then underscore my point for me. GOD, I love the internet. "Review", is NOT taking orders as you had stated. "Review" only underscores exactly what I said, that Clarke had taken the matter on his own initiative, within the established protocols at the time. Thank you for confirming that for me. And that his initiative and his procedures were approved. Approved. Not ordered. Big diffence. Especially when you're determined to split hairs to make a false condemnation. Thanks, David. You made my day. Made mine also as I was sitting here wondering after he posted that if he understood the English language at all. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bring me up to date... | CB | |||
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush | General | |||
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush | Scanner | |||
AWOL "bring 'em on" Bush | Shortwave |