|
|
"M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? That would depend upon the circumstances, 'tard boy. As do the circumstances in this case. Please, stop somewhere today and purchase a clue. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
When I was in boot camp,we were told,There Are No Excuses For Excuses!
It isn't hard to distinguish a plain clothes cop from somebody else.At least here in Mississippi,it isn't. cuhulin |
That "bloke" came out and ran.He commited suicide by cop.Would you have
ran? cuhulin |
|
In message , dxAce
writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? That would depend upon the circumstances, 'tard boy. As do the circumstances in this case. Listen clown. We have been deluged with info on this in every news bulletin and in every paper. They didn't know who he was and made no allowances for any other circumstances at all. In your brutal country it may be normal to do this sort of thing, but it isn't over here, nor in any other European country that I can think of.. Although it's getting that way. I understand that you are now debating on whether to execute a mentally retarded man. You are just waiting until he improves enough to pass the 75% barrier. Please, stop somewhere today and purchase a clue. Take your own advice. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
"M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , dxAce writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? That would depend upon the circumstances, 'tard boy. As do the circumstances in this case. Listen clown. I don't listen to 'tards... I see you failed to go out and purchase that clue! But not to worry, us brutal types stand at the ready to save both yours and Europes ass again if need be. No thanks are necessary. dxAce Michigan USA |
Only Subways (other than the Subway food places around here,there is one
at 2990 highway 49 South,one at 718 Highway 80 East,one 760 Highwy 49 South,one at 6351 I-55 North,one at 796 Lake Harbour Drive,one at Highway 80 East Brandon,one at Highway 49 North,one at 105 Katherine Drive,one at 628 Grants Ferry Road,one at 201 East Lay Fair Drive,one at 350 West Woodrow Wilson Ave,one at 109 Highway 80 East,one at 1057 Highway 51,one at 4020 Highway 80 West,one at 1225 North State Street,one at 210 East Capitol Street,148 South Pearson Road,one at 3360 North Liberty Street,one at 333 East Main Street,one at 4321 North State Street,one at 340 Highway 43 South,one at 3000 Highway 80 East,one at 4580 Clinton Blvd,one at 5820 Ridgewood Road,one at 1206 East Northside Drive,one at 2922 Terry Road,one at 2920 Lynch Street,one at 5791 Terry Road,one at 317 Village Square,and that is plenty enough Subway's for me) I have ever seen were in the movies.No way on Earth would I get in a Subway packed in there like a bunch of Sardines,NO WAY! Besides,I prefer to do all of my traveling on the ground,not under it or flying over it. cuhulin |
In message , dxAce
writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , dxAce writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? That would depend upon the circumstances, 'tard boy. As do the circumstances in this case. Listen clown. I don't listen to 'tards... I see you failed to go out and purchase that clue! Evasion. I win. What's a 'tard? But not to worry, us brutal types stand at the ready to save both yours and Europes ass again if need be. How much will you charge us next time.? Mike |
"M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , dxAce writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , dxAce writes "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? That would depend upon the circumstances, 'tard boy. As do the circumstances in this case. Listen clown. I don't listen to 'tards... I see you failed to go out and purchase that clue! Evasion. I win. Dream on, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Vanishing bombers and the mystery 'safe house' www.infowars.com
They are useing those 'it emerged' words again.It Emerged,that phrase is something new to me. cuhulin |
"M. J. Powell" wrote in message How much will you charge us next time.? Mike A lot. So start saving up those euros. B.H. |
|
Philip de Cadenet wrote: Visitor permit or not,he still should have stopped.The cops didn't know whether he was a terrorist or not.For all they knew,he could have had a bomb on him and was going to set it off.Bottom line is,When the cops holler STOP!,that means STOP! cuhulin _________________________________________________ They were plain cloths cops and AFAIK do not shove ID in your face. This fella had no idea they were cops. We have far more criminals with guns now in the UK than gun carrying police. The latter are in the minority. I can only imagine the guy was scared to hell. I'd run too. -- Philip de Cadenet Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com Do you really think that a major London underground station did not have at least one cop in uniform in front of him on that day? |
If it had been me,I would have stopped and showed my ID.I wouldn't have
had any reason to been running in the first place.(somebody mentioned he was running to work,or something like that.I have never been late to work in my life,I always left home in plenty enough time so I wouldn't be late for work. cuhulin |
Article at www.rense.com Why Was The Brazilian Electrician
'Petrified'? (scroll down the middle isle) If the theory is true,what did he see that he wasen't suppose to have seen? Were the cops planting something and they chased him and killed him to keep him from talking? cuhulin |
Dave,
Do you really think that a major London underground station did not have at least one cop in uniform in front of him on that day? From the newspaper report that I read he ran onto the train with the plain cloths officers in pursuit. It was there, in front of other passengers, that he came to an abrupt end. -- Philip de Cadenet Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
If it had been me,I would have stopped and showed my ID.I wouldn't have had any reason to been running in the first place.(somebody mentioned he was running to work,or something like that.I have never been late to work in my life,I always left home in plenty enough time so I wouldn't be late for work. It's not yet mandatory to carry ID here in the UK. -- Philip de Cadenet Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
There are a lot of homeless folks (some of them are homeless by choice,I
actually know a homeless guy from Lancaster,Penns Woods [[Pennslyvania to y'all dummies]]] in U.S.A.who do not tote any ID's,Damn! sometimes I envy them.Hey, www.devilfinder.com Hobo Convention Britt Iowa cuhulin |
When I was a kid in Carthage,Mississippi a million years ago.Us kids
would sometimes see a Hobo (at the time,we didn't know what a Hobo was) hanging around the Railroad tracks.We all called him the nickle man because he would always give us a nickle (back in the early 1940's a nickle was big money to us,you could buy a soda pop or a pack of nabs for a nickle or if we had a dime,we could buy a comic book) and he liked to tell us stories of where he had been.We used to run home and bring him sandwiches and whatever else we could scrounge up out out of our kitchens.Hoboes are Heroes. cuhulin |
I am Scotch Irish by Ancestry.To HELL with the brits!!!!!!!!
cuhulin |
M. J. Powell wrote:
What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? The Blacks would get angry again? oh..as a side note..pay no heed to the Ace. He's our local 'deficient in the qualities that make us human' representative. He's been like that since the horse kicked him in the side of the head during a visit to farm outside of Dayton, Ohio back in 1983. You will notice his repetitive use of the same three word as 'insults'. It's funny. mike |
Dave Holford wrote:
Do you really think that a major London underground station did not have at least one cop in uniform in front of him on that day? Is it possible the dead man was running towards the uniformed policeman in order to get help against his pursuers? Would the police even tell us if this were the case? mike |
|
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:43:49 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? They'd be clered for "acting in good faith." Mike |
|
|
In message E2zGe.171439$tt5.14560@edtnps90, m II
writes M. J. Powell wrote: What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? The Blacks would get angry again? oh..as a side note..pay no heed to the Ace. He's our local 'deficient in the qualities that make us human' representative. He's been like that since the horse kicked him in the side of the head during a visit to farm outside of Dayton, Ohio back in 1983. You will notice his repetitive use of the same three word as 'insults'. It's funny. Thank you. I'm new here. Mike |
|
Philip de Cadenet wrote:
BMC, It was revealed today the guys visitors permit had expired two years ago ! I guess he had a reason to run !! It was AFAIK a student visa. These last for typically one year however one can get an extension for a further year by showing proof that ones college fees have been paid in advance. After that period though one 'normally' has to return to ones home country. One exception is if one can find a sponsor and a good lawyer to receive a work permit but this must be impossible for an 'electrician'.! My 2p is that some of this is a government, media, police BS smoke screen for killing an innocent person. I think they call it 'damage limitation'. I hate to think what fallout there would of been had the guy been a Muslim. I have been waiting for this to come up. The Police are damned if they shoot and damned if they dont shoot. Some one from some where will moan, winge, wine and complain all about the Police and the way they acted. Well LISTEN......... As far as I am concerned they done the right thing, ok, its very very sad that an Inocent person got killed BUT.........If they didnt shoot and he WAS a bomber and it blew up and killed a load of people then people would have good cause to winge, wine, moan and complain. At times the Police just cant win, because every one else would have done it better. So letts all tell the Police NOT to shoot and to take a chance and see if he will blow up or not, just in case he is Inocent. **** THAT.... I dont think so. So next time then, if the Police DONT shoot and one goes off and if one of the people who get killed are a son or daughter or other loved one, then just say to your self ohhhhh thats just fine officer its better not to shoot in case he was Inoccent. It realy dont matter about the people who just got blown to pieces does it. This is REALITY like it or not. We all have to live with it. The Police are not perfect and will never be so, and if it comes to that neither are any of us. So for those who will moan, wine, winge and complain, THINK about it, would you rather take a chance or not? Knowing full well that chance may be your last on Earth. Ohhh I had better not shoot him just in case he isnt one.......just to please all those out there who know better than every oner else on earth. -- http://uk.geocities.com/swift240/mikes_page_1.html |
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:23:26 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
wrote: In message , writes On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:43:49 +0100, "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? They'd be clered for "acting in good faith." Report in the paper yesterday the police somewhere in the US fired 120 shots at an unarmed driver trying to get away. Mike M.J.Powell That was slightly over a month ago, the city was Compton located in Los Angeles County, California. The agency was Los Angeles Sheriff Department. The initial response to this by the Sheriff Department was that the deputies failed to coordinate their response with each other, failed to follow training/accepted practices for such a situation and in general blew it. FWIW, several Southern California law enforcement agencies are struggling with how to respond to threats from suspects in vehicles; 1) it is difficult at best to determine if they are armed and 2) the vehicle itself constitutes a weapon. So, somebody who is driving a 3000# 'weapon' and also has a firearm and is in a 'mighty ****ed off' state of mind does become a real threat to public safety. Sometimes law enforcement does truly blow it, try to remember that for every largely publicized error there are hundreds of traffic stops, warrants served and arrests made that happen without incident. |
Pay no heed to the Ace? (DxAce) I doubt very much that DxAce believes I
mess around with my dog.I always read and highly respect everything DxAce says.My sentiments exactly,DxAce. cuhulin |
I have never messed around with dope or drugs in my life and I never
will either.I reckon I am too dumb for that nonsense.Hey,I am naturally crazy,I don't need any dope or drugs to help me out with that. cuhulin |
In message , Howard
writes On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:23:26 +0100, "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:43:49 +0100, "M. J. Powell" wrote: In message , writes If all he was guilty of was not renewing his visitors permit,then he shoudn't have ran.He should have stopped regardless.He would either be walking around in limeyland now or on his way back to Brazil,whatever.Things are very tense over there,he should have known that.He was stupid and the cops did the right thing. What would happen in America if two cops held a man down on the ground while the third cop shot him 8 times? They'd be clered for "acting in good faith." Report in the paper yesterday the police somewhere in the US fired 120 shots at an unarmed driver trying to get away. Mike M.J.Powell That was slightly over a month ago, the city was Compton located in Los Angeles County, California. The agency was Los Angeles Sheriff Department. The initial response to this by the Sheriff Department was that the deputies failed to coordinate their response with each other, failed to follow training/accepted practices for such a situation and in general blew it. I hope it was in a rural area. The idea of 120 rounds flying about in a populated place is frightening. FWIW, several Southern California law enforcement agencies are struggling with how to respond to threats from suspects in vehicles; 1) it is difficult at best to determine if they are armed and 2) the vehicle itself constitutes a weapon. So, somebody who is driving a 3000# 'weapon' and also has a firearm and is in a 'mighty ****ed off' state of mind does become a real threat to public safety. Sometimes law enforcement does truly blow it, try to remember that for every largely publicized error there are hundreds of traffic stops, warrants served and arrests made that happen without incident. Brit practice is to follow until something happens. A helicopter is useful. If the driver is known to be armed then an ARV (Armed Response Vehicle) is called in. The occupants have to get permission from a senior officer to open the locked box and carry the firearms. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
M.J.Powell,I am not the clown.
cuhulin |
Here in Jackson,Mississippi,if something like that happens (and believe
y'all me,sometimes something similar to that does happen here in Jackson) the cops are laid off with pay while an investigation goes on via the Jackson Police Department.Same with the Hinds County Sheriff's Department.More or less,it is the same procedure all over U.S.A.I kind of hate to say it,but there are some crooked cops all over U.S.A.and the World.I personally know some local Jackson area cops and they are A OK. cuhulin |
120 shots? OKayyyyyyy.
cuhulin |
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:12:25 +0100, "M. J. Powell"
wrote: snip Report in the paper yesterday the police somewhere in the US fired 120 shots at an unarmed driver trying to get away. Mike M.J.Powell That was slightly over a month ago, the city was Compton located in Los Angeles County, California. The agency was Los Angeles Sheriff Department. The initial response to this by the Sheriff Department was that the deputies failed to coordinate their response with each other, failed to follow training/accepted practices for such a situation and in general blew it. I hope it was in a rural area. The idea of 120 rounds flying about in a populated place is frightening. It was an urban area and yes, even folks not in the lines of fire were frightened that it happened. FWIW, several Southern California law enforcement agencies are struggling with how to respond to threats from suspects in vehicles; 1) it is difficult at best to determine if they are armed and 2) the vehicle itself constitutes a weapon. So, somebody who is driving a 3000# 'weapon' and also has a firearm and is in a 'mighty ****ed off' state of mind does become a real threat to public safety. Sometimes law enforcement does truly blow it, try to remember that for every largely publicized error there are hundreds of traffic stops, warrants served and arrests made that happen without incident. Brit practice is to follow until something happens. A helicopter is useful. If the driver is known to be armed then an ARV (Armed Response Vehicle) is called in. The occupants have to get permission from a senior officer to open the locked box and carry the firearms. Mike That is what our law enforcement agencies do also, wherever possible. Often, the suspect will stop and force a confrontation in a highly populated area which leaves the officers little choice in their response. The case cited above is NOT typical of law enforcement response where the goal is apprehension of the suspect with minimal risk to the general public. FWIW, I am familiar with Compton and can offer that if patrolled by the Brits they would NOT keep their firearms in a lock-box. Howard |
Howard wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:12:25 +0100, "M. J. Powell" wrote: snip Report in the paper yesterday the police somewhere in the US fired 120 shots at an unarmed driver trying to get away. Mike M.J.Powell That was slightly over a month ago, the city was Compton located in Los Angeles County, California. The agency was Los Angeles Sheriff Department. The initial response to this by the Sheriff Department was that the deputies failed to coordinate their response with each other, failed to follow training/accepted practices for such a situation and in general blew it. I hope it was in a rural area. The idea of 120 rounds flying about in a populated place is frightening. It was an urban area and yes, even folks not in the lines of fire were frightened that it happened. FWIW, several Southern California law enforcement agencies are struggling with how to respond to threats from suspects in vehicles; 1) it is difficult at best to determine if they are armed and 2) the vehicle itself constitutes a weapon. So, somebody who is driving a 3000# 'weapon' and also has a firearm and is in a 'mighty ****ed off' state of mind does become a real threat to public safety. Sometimes law enforcement does truly blow it, try to remember that for every largely publicized error there are hundreds of traffic stops, warrants served and arrests made that happen without incident. Brit practice is to follow until something happens. A helicopter is useful. If the driver is known to be armed then an ARV (Armed Response Vehicle) is called in. The occupants have to get permission from a senior officer to open the locked box and carry the firearms. Mike That is what our law enforcement agencies do also, wherever possible. Often, the suspect will stop and force a confrontation in a highly populated area which leaves the officers little choice in their response. The case cited above is NOT typical of law enforcement response where the goal is apprehension of the suspect with minimal risk to the general public. FWIW, I am familiar with Compton and can offer that if patrolled by the Brits they would NOT keep their firearms in a lock-box. Yeah, Compton ain't Ozzie and Harriet land, that's for sure. dxAce Michigan USA |
A few years ago,the idea of an old elderly guy in Northern limeyland
whom was defending his life with his Firearm agains't burglers (that married Irish woman in Bognor Regis,England emailed me news about that,she hates limeyland) was amazing too,wasen't it? He went to gaol. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com