On 23 Jul 2005 18:54:42 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

Then target the journalists/media. So far, (it may yet change) this looks
to be something they have cooked-up and are perpetuating. The media brought
up Plame first. As far as I have seen reported, Rove merely said “I’ve
heard that same rumor too”. Then the media (and the Rove-haters) equated
that to “confirmation”. Any other reasonable and prudent person would agree
that all Rove is guilty of is admitting to hearing the same rumor. Based on
that evidence alone, anyone who equates that to confirmation is being
patently unreasonable and imprudent.

-=jd=-
Your timeline is flawed. The White House requested info about the
Wilsons on 7 July 2003. Rove ''leaked'' to Novak on 8 July 2003.

Where and when did anyone in the media report that Mrs. Wilson was a
CIA UC prior to Novak's piece?

For just *one* source, see the 230+ line message:
Subject: Joseph Wilson's Amazing Left-Wing Dreamland
Posted by:"SeeingEyeDog"
Citation: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=18868

Partial quote:
“...However, Plame's identity was, in the words of Robert Novak, "not much of a
secret." Cliff May states he was told of Plame's work - as a desk jockey at Langley, to
which job she drove everyday - in a blas‚ manner, as though all Washington insiders
knew of it. Perhaps they did; Plame acknowledges she "outed" herself to Joseph Wilson
at roughly the time of their first kiss. Given the current dating-and-mating habits of
Beltways divorcees, she's likely kissed others, perhaps using her CIA job as foreplay
at each rendezvous. As noted above, she also exposed her Agency
name and cover job on her political donation to Al Gore in 2000. In fact,
other national media outlets had named her as an agent before Karl Rove's
disclosure to Novak. Further, the CIA did nothing to prevent Robert Novak
from printing her name in his syndicated column, indicating they did not
consider the exposure vital - perhaps grudging recognition of the fact that
this genie had long been out of the bottle....”


-=jd=-
So why did Rove and Libby lie to the investigators? Why did they make
poor Scotty McLellan lie for them to the press?

David wrote:
On 23 Jul 2005 18:08:03 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


I'm not sure how "vital" and "secret" a desk-job would be; nor am I certain
that Rove admitting he heard a similar rumor equates to "political
revenge". But you keep slinging stuff at the wall and perhaps one day you
may accidentally get something to stick. Until then, your parroting and
plagiarizing of (so far) unsubstantiated, wishful-thinking, "drama-queen"
theatrics will only get you gales of derisive laughter! It is fun watching
you attempt to spin clear facts into they are not.

-=jd=-
You are showing your ignorance. Why did the CIA refer charges to the
DOJ if no harm was done?

politics

In philosophy it is called "begging the question".
A lay person may call it "The dog chasing its tail".
In David's case it is a perfect example of Communist style propaganda..

"David" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:26:45 -0400, dxAce
wrote:

Thus far, lying to the Feds, obstruction of justice, probably
violating his Form 312 pledge.

From: David
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:12:46 GMT
Subject: 11 separate acts of treason committed by the White House

=-
So why did Rove and Libby lie to the investigators? Why did they make
poor Scotty McLellan lie for them to the press?

Because McClellan's job is to lie to the press.

Regarding your origina1 post, those 11 acts, I heard that too. Ooops!
there I go. Treason! Slap the cuffs on me!

Greg

"David" wrote in message
...
On 23 Jul 2005 15:35:43 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


Stop the presses!! rickets confirmed as 'tard!

-=jd=-

Laugh as you will. These people have committed an unprecedented act
of wreckless disregard for an ongoing intelligence operation,
endangering national security and putting dozens of human assetts in
danger.

While you ignore this, and choose to instead engage in juvenile name
calling, we are all put in deeper peril by those we entrusted to make
things better.

It's a non-issue. The desperation of the left deepens.

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:40:24 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


It's a non-issue. The desperation of the left deepens.

Non-issue? Right.

Can terrorist build the bomb? Popular Science article at
www.worldnetdaily.com which reminds me,I got two snail mail notices
last week.I need to renew my subscriptions to Popular Science and
Popular Mechanics snail mail magazines.I have been reading those two
magazines since back in the 1940's.I used to read Mechanix Illustrated
and Science And Mechanics magazines too,but they went belly up years
ago.
cuhulin

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:14:53 -0500, wrote:

Can terrorist build the bomb? Popular Science article at
www.worldnetdaily.com which reminds me,I got two snail mail notices
last week.I need to renew my subscriptions to Popular Science and
Popular Mechanics snail mail magazines.I have been reading those two
magazines since back in the 1940's.I used to read Mechanix Illustrated
and Science And Mechanics magazines too,but they went belly up years
ago.
cuhulin

Israel's got one. Pakistan's got one. What more do you need to know?